Helicopter Fuselage Differential Frame Fuel Tank Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The integration of fuel tanks into helicopter fuselage airframes is complex, requiring multiple fuel bladders and intricate fuel system devices, leading to time-consuming assembly and maintenance processes, with risks of damaging fuel bladders during drilling operations and limitations in structural design.

Innovation Solution

A fuselage airframe design featuring a differential frame with a variable-height lower section and transversal beams that partitions the subfloor compartment into two cells, allowing for the integration of two fuel bladders connected by a middle bladder without the need for interconnecting devices, reducing assembly complexity and enabling easy installation and maintenance without drilling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If continuous frames and longerons are used to enclose the subfloor compartment, then structural strength and stability are improved, but the fuel tank integration becomes complex requiring multiple fuel bladders and interconnecting devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidfuel system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous frame is segmented into two separate frames with a gap between them. This segmentation allows the fuel tank to be integrated directly into the gap without requiring multiple fuel bladders and interconnecting devices, thereby reducing fuel system complexity while maintaining structural strength through the two separate frames

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fuel tank integration is extracted from the complex multi-bladder system and placed directly into the gap between two frames. This extraction simplifies the overall system by eliminating the need for intermediate transfer pipes and scavenge lines, reducing both device complexity and assembly time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Quantity of substance

If multiple fuel bladders are used to fill the subfloor compartment, then fuel storage capacity is improved, but assembly time and integration effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel storage capacityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The gap between two frames is used to house a single integrated fuel tank that serves the entire subfloor compartment. This merging approach consolidates multiple fuel storage functions into one unified structure, eliminating the need for multiple separate fuel bladders and their corresponding interconnecting devices, thereby reducing assembly time while maintaining adequate fuel storage capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If drilling operations are performed in the fuel tank area, then structural modifications are enabled, but the risk of damaging fuel bladders increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural modification capabilityVSAvoidfuel bladder integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel tank is positioned in the gap between two frames, extracting it from the drilling zone. This positioning eliminates the need for drilling operations in the fuel tank area, thereby protecting fuel bladder integrity while still enabling structural modifications through the frame gap without compromising fuel storage reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If fuel system devices are conducted through structural elements, then fuel transfer functionality is achieved, but the structural elements require cut-outs reducing their structural integrity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel transfer functionalityVSAvoidstructural element integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel transfer functionality is extracted from the traditional approach of conducting devices through structural elements. Instead, fuel transfer is achieved through the gap between two frames where the fuel tank is directly integrated, eliminating the need for cut-outs in structural elements and preserving their full structural integrity while maintaining fuel transfer capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP2905228B1Fuselage Airframe and Tank
Publication Date: 2018.01.03 AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUT GMBH
  • EP2905228B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2905228B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2905228B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a fuel tank (19) and a differential frame (3) in a fuselage airframe (1) of a helicopter, the fuel tank (19) being installed between the fuselage lower cover shell (4) and the floor panel (5). The differential frame (3) separates the fuel tank (19) into two individual compartments, the differential frame (3) having a web (15) below the floor panel with a variable-height (23) with a minimum height at the symmetry axis (18) of the fuselage cross-section and a maximum height at lateral frame roots regions (27). A transversal beam (7) is attached at each of its both ends to the differential frame (3) bridging the entire variable-height (23) of the differential frame (3) and the fuel tank (19) with two front and rear fuel bladders (20, 21) covering both individual tank compartments with a middle bladder (22) installed between the transversal beam (7) and the variable-height web (15) of the differential frame (3).