Fuselage Panel Join Using Dual Rings for Fatigue Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft fuselage assemblies face challenges in transmitting high forces between panels, leading to reduced reserve factors and increased risk of fatigue cracks, especially at circumferential joins, due to the limitations of existing reinforcing ring designs which fail to adequately handle increased loads and aerodynamic stresses.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of an outer ring, positioned on the outer face of the fuselage, partially overlapping the panels and fixed to both the inner ring and panels, which works in conjunction with the inner ring to distribute forces in a double shearing manner, reducing bending moments and enhancing the reserve factor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the thickness of the ring is increased to increase the ability of the join to transmit forces, then the force transmission capacity is improved, but the reserve factor does not significantly improve and secondary bending moments increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce transmission capacityVSAvoidreserve factor
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single ring structure is segmented into two separate rings: an inner ring and an outer ring. The inner ring is positioned inside the fuselage and the outer ring is positioned outside the fuselage, with both rings working together to transmit forces. This segmentation allows each ring to be optimized independently and distributes the load more effectively, improving the reserve factor while maintaining force transmission capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution transitions from a single-plane ring structure to a two-dimensional configuration with rings positioned on both the inner and outer faces of the fuselage. This dimensional change creates a multi-layered force transmission system that reduces bending moments and improves the reserve factor by distributing loads more effectively across multiple planes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If the thickness of the ring is increased to transmit higher loads, then the static strength is improved, but the secondary bending moment increases rapidly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatic strengthVSAvoidsecondary bending moment
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The single ring is divided into inner and outer rings that are spaced apart, creating a distributed force transmission system. This segmentation reduces the secondary bending moment by distributing the load across multiple rings rather than concentrating it in a single thick ring, while maintaining the required static strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inner and outer rings are positioned at specific locations (inner and outer faces of the fuselage) where they can most effectively resist bending moments. This localized placement optimizes the structure by concentrating reinforcement where it is most needed, reducing secondary bending moments while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If a single inner ring is used to assemble panels at a circumferential join, then the structure is simple, but the reserve factor reduces under increased loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidreserve factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single inner ring is segmented into an inner ring and an outer ring, creating a dual-ring system. While this increases structural complexity slightly, it significantly improves the reserve factor by distributing forces more effectively. The segmented design allows each ring to be optimized for its specific function while working together to enhance overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Shape

If panels are assembled end-to-end at a circumferential join, then aerodynamic continuity is maintained, but force transmission capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic continuityVSAvoidforce transmission capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The force transmission function is segmented between the inner ring and outer ring, allowing the panels to be assembled end-to-end for aerodynamic continuity while the dual-ring system provides the necessary force transmission capability. The segmentation of the reinforcement system compensates for the reduced force transmission inherent in end-to-end assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7857258B2Assembly of panels of an airplane fuselage
Publication Date: 2010.12.28 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US7857258B2 patent drawing
  • US7857258B2 patent drawing
  • US7857258B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft fuselage including at least two sections kept assembled at a circumferential join, each section having at least one panel. The circumferential join includes at least one inner ring, situated on one face, called the inner face, of the fuselage. The inner ring has a width li, partially overlaps each of the two panels and is fixed to the two panels by fasteners. The fuselage also includes an outer ring, situated on one face, called the outer face, of the fuselage, opposite to the inner face. The outer ring has a width le, partially overlaps the two panels, and is fixed to the two panels and to the inner ring by some or all of the fasteners fixing the inner ring to the two panels.