Aircraft Fuselage Removable Structural Panel for Load-Transfer Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft designs with hinged doors and latching mechanisms for large cryogenic tanks are heavy and not designed for continuous load transfer, limiting their use for frequent installation and removal of major components like hydrogen tanks.

Innovation Solution

A fuselage design with a removable structural panel and a locking structure that ensures continuous load transfer by using symmetrical lock fittings and lock parts with tapered profiles for alignment and positive-locking connections, allowing efficient insertion and removal of tanks without damaging the primary structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If hinged doors with latching mechanisms are used for tank access, then ease of operation is improved, but weight increases and continuous load transfer capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The fuselage access system is segmented into a removable structural panel that can be separated from the main fuselage structure. This panel includes lock fittings and lock parts that enable independent removal and installation, dividing the access function from the primary load-bearing structure while maintaining operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structural panel is extracted as a separate, removable component from the fuselage primary structure. This extraction allows the panel to be removed completely for tank access while the remaining fuselage structure maintains its integrity and load transfer capability, eliminating the need for heavy hinged doors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If hinged doors with latching mechanisms are used for tank access, then ease of operation is improved, but structural integrity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The access system is segmented into a removable panel that separates the access function from the primary structure. The panel includes integrated lock fittings and lock parts that provide secure attachment during installation while allowing complete removal when needed, preserving fuselage structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structural panel is extracted as a discrete component that can be completely removed from the fuselage. This extraction ensures that the primary fuselage structure remains intact and maintains its load transfer capability, unlike hinged doors that require permanent attachment points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If structural panel with locking structure is used, then load transfer capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking structure is segmented into discrete lock fittings attached to the fuselage and corresponding lock parts on the panel. This segmentation allows for straightforward assembly and disassembly while maintaining load transfer capability through the distributed locking points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lock fittings and lock parts feature asymmetric tapered profiles that guide proper alignment during installation. The tapered geometry provides self-aligning characteristics that simplify the assembly process while ensuring correct positioning for load transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Adaptability or versatility

If removable structural panel is used for tank installation, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The lock fittings and lock parts incorporate asymmetric tapered profiles that provide self-aligning characteristics during assembly. The tapered geometry guides the panel into correct positioning, compensating for minor manufacturing variations and reducing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The lock fittings are pre-attached to the fuselage structure at predetermined locations before panel installation. This preliminary positioning establishes reference points that guide the panel alignment and reduce the precision required for final panel fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4691905A1Fuselage of an aircraft, method for closing an opening of the fuselage and aircraft having such fuselage
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • EP4691905A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2b
  • EP4691905A1 patent drawingFigure 2c~3
  • EP4691905A1 patent drawingFigure 4a~5

AI summary

The present invention provides a fuselage (101) of an aircraft (100), comprising a front portion (102) and a rear portion (103), with at least one opening (106) provided in the rear portion (103), with the opening (106) being closeable by a structural panel (107) fully removeable from the opening (106), wherein a locking structure (109) for the structural panel (107) is provided in the opening (106) and configured to transfer loads between a primary structure (108) of the fuselage (101) and the structural panel (107), a for closing an opening (106) of a fuselage (101)and an aircraft (100) having such a fuselage (101)..