Fuser Braking Mechanism for Noise Reduction in Image Forming Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing electrophotographic image forming apparatus experiences noise due to 'forward slip' of the cam caused by backlash in gear teeth, which is not effectively mitigated by current braking mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus incorporates a braking mechanism comprising a second gear and second cam with a specific cam profile that compresses the second spring, increasing its urging force and applying braking moments to the first cam, reducing its rotation speed and minimizing noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a braking mechanism with a partial gear having a missing gear section is used, then the faster rotation of the cam caused by the urging force of the spring can be braked, but a single tooth may receive entire load of the full gear causing increased stress and potential failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidtooth load capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The braking mechanism is divided into two functional parts: the partial gear with missing gear section that provides braking action, and the full gear that provides structural support and distributes load. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in its function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The partial gear has different structural quality at different locations: the missing gear section provides braking functionality while the remaining teeth maintain normal gear engagement. This local differentiation optimizes both noise reduction and load distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If the cam rotates at higher speed during forward slip, then the pressure roller can move faster from the nip release position to the nip position, but noise is generated due to backlash in the gear teeth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecam rotation speedVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The braking mechanism converts the harmful effect of spring urging force (which causes forward slip and noise) into a beneficial braking action. The partial gear engages with the full gear to create friction that opposes the unwanted rotation, thereby reducing noise while maintaining controlled movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The braking mechanism acts as an intermediary between the cam and the drive system. It mediates the interaction by providing controlled resistance to the cam's rotation, preventing direct transmission of backlash-induced vibrations and noise to the gear system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces noise associated with the forward slip of the cam by slowing its rotation and maintaining proper frictional forces, enhancing the operational stability of the image forming apparatus.

Implementation Method 1

The second spring may urge the second gear in the direction along the second axis. The second cam may be configured to move the second gear in the direction along the second axis, against urging force of the second spring.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The second spring may urge the second gear in the direction along the second axis. The second cam may be configured to move the second gear in the direction along the second axis, against urging force of the second spring to increase the urging force of the second spring.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

The first spring may urge the presser toward the heater.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 4

The second cam may be configured to rotate together with the second gear. The second cam may be configured to move the second gear in the direction along the second axis, against urging force of the second spring to increase the urging force of the second spring.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS10663899B2Image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US10663899B2 patent drawing
  • US10663899B2 patent drawing
  • US10663899B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fuser includes a heater, a presser, a support member that supports the presser to allow the presser to move between a nip position where the presser is in pressured contact with the heater, and a separated position where the presser is separated from the heater, a first spring, a first cam, a first gear, a second gear, a second spring, and a second cam. The second cam has a cam profile that, when the presser moves from the separated position to the nip position, causes the second gear to move in a direction along a second axis against urging force of the second spring to increase the urging force of the second spring.