Fusion-Bonded 3D Memory Stack for Wide-IO Capacity Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional DRAM structures face a trade-off between increasing external bandwidth and maintaining total memory capacity within a given x-y form factor, leading to decreased memory capacity as die size increases to accommodate pin placement and routing.

Innovation Solution

A fusion bonded 3D stacked wide-IO memory structure is implemented, utilizing a via-last approach to achieve high-bandwidth and high-capacity memory with a compact form factor, combining face-to-face fusion bonding and a reduced cost wafer stack.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If die size is increased to accommodate pin placement and routing for higher external bandwidth, then external bandwidth is improved, but total memory capacity decreases within a given x-y form factor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexternal bandwidthVSAvoidtotal memory capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a 2D planar arrangement to a 3D stacked architecture by bonding multiple memory dies vertically. This dimensional change allows memory capacity to scale in the z-direction (vertical stacking) while maintaining a compact x-y footprint, thereby preserving high memory capacity without sacrificing external bandwidth achieved through wide I/O on each die

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If 3D stacked memory structure is implemented to increase memory capacity in compact form factor, then memory capacity is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory capacityVSAvoidstacking structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The memory system is segmented into multiple independent dies that can be fabricated separately using conventional processes, then bonded together. Each die maintains standard I/O configurations, allowing modular assembly and simplifying the overall manufacturing workflow compared to creating a single complex monolithic structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of bonding dies face-to-face (front surfaces together), the patent employs back-to-back bonding where opposite faces (back surfaces) are bonded together. This inversion simplifies the bonding process by accessing and preparing the back surfaces of dies, which are otherwise less constrained during fabrication, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If hybrid bonding is used to achieve high-performance 3D stacking, then electrical performance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs conventional bonding techniques (such as eutectic bonding or sintering) that use simpler, more cost-effective materials and processes compared to hybrid bonding. While hybrid bonding offers superior electrical performance, the conventional bonding approach provides adequate performance at significantly lower manufacturing cost, making it economically viable for mass production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides an extremely wide-IO structure with high memory capacity in a small x-y form factor, achieving approximately 12 GB in a memory package size equivalent to conventional LPDDR5x, while reducing costs compared to hybrid bonding.

Implementation Method 1

a back side of the second memory chip is coupled to a back side of the third memory chip through fusion bonding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFusion bonding: Diffusion Welding

Data Source

PatentUS20260068623A1Memory device comprising multiple chips coupled together through fusion bonding
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20260068623A1 patent drawing
  • US20260068623A1 patent drawing
  • US20260068623A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device comprising a memory device comprising: a first memory chip; a second memory chip coupled to the first memory chip, wherein a front side of the first memory chip is coupled to a front side of the second memory chip; a third memory chip coupled to the second memory chip, wherein a back side of the second memory chip is coupled to a back side of the third memory chip through fusion bonding; and a fourth memory chip coupled to the third memory chip, wherein a front side of the third memory chip is coupled to a front side of the fourth memory chip.