Fusion Reactor Plasma Control with ML Sensor Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing and controlling fusion reactors is complex due to conflicting requirements among integrated systems, and sensors used for plasma control are fragile and prone to failure from neutron flux, limiting the ability to achieve optimal plasma states and reactor performance.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning approach is applied to design and control fusion reactors, using a combination of primary and secondary sensors to develop and adjust control models, allowing for optimal plasma control and adaptation even after primary sensor failure, and to simulate and optimize reactor parameters efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If complex systems and processes are integrated to achieve high plasma temperatures, densities, and confinement, then fusion performance is improved, but device complexity increases and design difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefusion performanceVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies machine learning models to perform multiple functions: optimizing plasma control parameters, predicting sensor failures, and adapting to degradation in real-time. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate complex control systems, reducing overall design complexity while maintaining high fusion performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model dynamically adjusts control parameters based on real-time sensor data and predicted degradation patterns. By continuously optimizing parameters rather than using fixed settings, the system achieves high fusion performance without requiring overly complex hardware configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If sensors are placed close to the plasma to improve measurement precision, then plasma control accuracy is improved, but sensor reliability deteriorates due to neutron flux damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplasma state measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model is trained in advance on historical sensor data to learn patterns of plasma behavior and sensor degradation. This preliminary training enables the model to predict sensor failures before they occur and to compensate for degradation, maintaining measurement precision even as sensors deteriorate from neutron exposure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor readings and feeds this data back to the machine learning model, which adjusts its predictions and control recommendations in real-time. This feedback loop allows the system to adapt to sensor degradation dynamically, maintaining accurate plasma control despite deteriorating sensor reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If skilled design teams manually optimize reactor parameters, then local maxima can be found, but the exploration of possible solutions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign optimization qualityVSAvoidsolution space exploration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model autonomously optimizes reactor parameters without requiring continuous human intervention. It self-adjusts control settings based on real-time data and predicted degradation patterns, enabling exploration of a much broader solution space than manual optimization while maintaining high design quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static manual optimization to dynamic automated optimization. The machine learning model continuously adapts parameters in real-time based on changing conditions and sensor degradation, enabling versatile exploration of the solution space while maintaining precise optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11587690B2Machine learning in fusion reactors
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 TOKAMAK ENERGY
  • US11587690B2 patent drawing
  • US11587690B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a plasma in a nuclear fusion reactor. The nuclear fusion reactor comprises sensors and plasma control inputs. An initial control model is provided, relating readings of at least a subset of the sensors to control of the plasma control inputs. A control loop is performed, comprising: operating the plasma control inputs in dependence upon the sensors according to the control model; determining correlations between readings of each of the sensors, and/or between readings of the sensors and states of the plasma control inputs; and adjusting the control model based on the determined correlations.