Hearing Audio Noise Prediction for Low-Latency Noise Subtraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hearing devices face challenges in providing satisfactory noise cancellation and speech enhancement, with a need for improved methods to effectively remove background noise and enhance speech.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for training a neural network to process audio data from microphones, using sequential training to predict future noise, and applying this network in hearing devices to estimate and subtract noise from input signals, combined with a hearing system comprising processors and transducers for improved noise cancellation and sound quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional noise cancellation methods are used in hearing devices, then noise removal capability is provided, but speech enhancement satisfaction remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackground noise removalVSAvoidspeech enhancement quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the audio signal processing into distinct components: separating the mixture signal into speech components and noise components through spectral analysis, then processing them independently through different filtering operations. This allows optimized noise cancellation without compromising speech enhancement quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs spectral processing techniques that analyze and modify frequency parameters of the audio signal. By transforming the signal into the frequency domain and applying frequency-selective filtering, the system achieves effective noise removal while preserving speech characteristics through parameter-based differentiation between noise and speech spectra.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If improved noise cancellation algorithms are implemented, then noise removal effectiveness increases, but processing time and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise cancellation effectivenessVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary spectral analysis and noise characterization in advance, creating noise profiles and spectral templates before the actual noise cancellation operation. This pre-processing enables faster real-time noise removal by avoiding complex calculations during critical audio processing moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces computationally intensive traditional noise cancellation algorithms with spectral processing techniques and neural network-based models that can achieve similar or better performance with reduced computational complexity, thereby lowering processing latency while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If complex neural network training methods are used, then noise prediction accuracy improves, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise prediction accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copy-based training strategies where multiple simplified neural network models are trained on different subsets of training data and then aggregated. This approach achieves high prediction accuracy through ensemble methods while reducing the computational burden on any single model and enabling more efficient training processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial training strategies where neural networks are trained on representative subsets of audio data rather than requiring complete datasets. By using partial training with carefully selected training samples, the system achieves sufficient prediction accuracy with significantly reduced training time and computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4679423A1Noise prediction in a hearing system and related methods
Publication Date: 2026.01.14 GN HEARING AS
  • EP4679423A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4679423A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4679423A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A hearing device, a hearing system, and related methods are disclosed, the hearing device comprising a set of input transducers providing a transducer input, the set of input transducers comprising a first input transducer for provision of a first transducer input signal, wherein the transducer input is based on the first transducer input signal; a processor configured to process the transducer input and provide an electrical output signal based on the transducer input; and a receiver for converting the electrical output signal to an audio output signal, wherein to process the transducer input comprises to process the transducer input for provision of a first input and a second input; apply a neural network to the second input for provision of a second output being a signal that is a prediction of future noise; provide a noise estimate based on the second output; and subtract the noise estimate from a first input magnitude of the first input for provision of a first output, wherein to provide the electrical output signal is based on the first output.