Automated Insurance Underwriting System Using Fuzzy Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The insurance underwriting process is plagued by variability and inconsistency due to subjective underwriter judgment, ambiguous underwriting standards, and the need for manual processing of non-standard information, such as attending physician statements, which hinders automation and increases cycle time.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing fuzzy logic-based rules for evaluating insurance applications, allowing for partial degrees of satisfaction and flexible adjustment of underwriting standards, combined with case-based reasoning for decision-making, to automate the underwriting process and standardize non-standard information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual processing of non-standard information (e.g., attending physician statements) is used, then underwriting accuracy can be maintained, but cycle time increases and automation is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderwriting accuracyVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processing of non-standard information with an automated system that uses fuzzy logic and case-based reasoning. The system automatically evaluates and summarizes APS documents, extracts relevant information, and integrates it with standardized data to produce underwriting decisions without human intervention, thereby eliminating the time loss while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary summarization and evaluation module that acts as a mediator between the non-standard APS information and the automated underwriting decision system. This intermediary component processes and translates the unstructured medical information into a format that can be automatically evaluated by the fuzzy logic system, enabling automation while preserving the nuance of non-standard information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If human underwriters process applications subjectively, then flexibility in judgment is maintained, but variability and inconsistency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderwriter judgment flexibilityVSAvoiddecision consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms subjective human judgment into objective computational parameters through fuzzy logic. Instead of relying on underwriter discretion, the system uses defined fuzzy sets and membership functions that convert qualitative judgment criteria into quantifiable parameters. This allows the system to maintain the flexibility of human judgment while ensuring consistent, repeatable results through mathematical rigor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through case-based reasoning, where past underwriting decisions and outcomes are stored and retrieved to guide current evaluations. The system learns from historical data and adjusts its evaluations accordingly, providing feedback that ensures consistency while maintaining adaptability to new situations. This feedback loop eliminates variability by anchoring decisions in proven patterns from the past.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated underwriting is implemented, then efficiency and consistency are improved, but handling of non-standard information becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderwriting efficiencyVSAvoidhandling of non-standard information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary summarization and evaluation module that acts as a mediator between the non-standard APS information and the automated underwriting decision system. This intermediary component processes and translates the unstructured medical information into a format that can be automatically evaluated by the fuzzy logic system, enabling automation while preserving the nuance of non-standard information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms subjective human judgment into objective computational parameters through fuzzy logic. Instead of relying on underwriter discretion, the system uses defined fuzzy sets and membership functions that convert qualitative judgment criteria into quantifiable parameters. This allows the system to maintain the flexibility of human judgment while ensuring consistent, repeatable results through mathematical rigor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If strict underwriting standards are applied consistently, then decision uniformity is achieved, but ability to handle edge cases and gray areas is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision uniformityVSAvoidhandling of edge cases
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms subjective human judgment into objective computational parameters through fuzzy logic. Instead of relying on underwriter discretion, the system uses defined fuzzy sets and membership functions that convert qualitative judgment criteria into quantifiable parameters. This allows the system to maintain the flexibility of human judgment while ensuring consistent, repeatable results through mathematical rigor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the underwriting system dynamic by using fuzzy logic that can adapt to different scenarios. The fuzzy sets and membership functions allow the system to dynamically adjust its evaluations based on the specific characteristics of each application, enabling it to handle edge cases and gray areas with the same flexibility as traditional human judgment while maintaining uniformity through consistent mathematical application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8793146B2System for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
Publication Date: 2014.07.29 PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US8793146B2 patent drawing
  • US8793146B2 patent drawing
  • US8793146B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for at least a partial underwriting of insurance policies is described. Various rules are created, along with a degree of satisfaction for each rule. Rules may be directed toward various insurance underwriting components (e.g., cholesterol levels, blood pressure, etc.). Based on the degree of satisfaction for each rule, a component may be assigned to a category. Based on the category for each component, the insurance application may be assigned an underwriting category.