Mitigating Cycle-Skipping in Full Waveform Inversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current full waveform inversion (FWI) methods face challenges in avoiding cycle-skipping, which leads to convergence to local minima due to the oscillatory nature of seismic data, resulting in inaccurate subsurface models.

Innovation Solution

A probabilistic approach is introduced to identify seismic traces prone to cycle-skipping by calculating a probabilistic measure based on the relationship between recorded and estimated seismic data, using statistical functions to determine travel-time differences and phase differences, and applying these measures to select and weight data for FWI, ensuring accurate subsurface modeling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional full waveform inversion is applied to seismic data, then subsurface imaging is performed, but cycle-skipping occurs leading to convergence at local minima

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubsurface imaging accuracyVSAvoidconvergence reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary quality control measures before performing full waveform inversion. It calculates travel-time differences between observed and modeled seismic data, identifies traces exceeding threshold values (indicating cycle-skipping), and excludes these problematic traces from the inversion process. This preliminary filtering action prevents cycle-skipping from causing convergence to local minima, thereby improving both imaging accuracy and convergence reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If all recorded seismic data is used in FWI, then more data is available for inversion, but traces with large travel-time differences cause cycle-skipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of seismic dataVSAvoidphase difference accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality control by evaluating each seismic trace individually for cycle-skipping conditions. It calculates travel-time differences for each trace against a threshold value and applies different treatment: traces within the threshold are included in FWI with full weight, while traces exceeding the threshold are excluded or down-weighted. This local differentiation ensures that high-quality traces contribute maximally to imaging precision while problematic traces do not degrade the overall result.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If a fixed frequency cut-off is used in FWI, then computational complexity is reduced, but cycle-skipping cannot be effectively mitigated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidcycle-skipping mitigation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptivity by making the frequency cut-off parameter variable rather than fixed. It calculates travel-time differences for each trace and dynamically adjusts the frequency cut-off based on these differences: traces with small travel-time differences use higher frequencies for better resolution, while traces with large differences apply lower frequency cut-offs or exclusion to prevent cycle-skipping. This dynamic approach maintains computational efficiency while effectively mitigating cycle-skipping across diverse trace conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11175421B2Device and method for mitigating cycle-skipping in full waveform inversion
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 CGG SERVICES SA
  • US11175421B2 patent drawing
  • US11175421B2 patent drawing
  • US11175421B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computing device, computer instructions and method for identifying seismic traces prone to cycle-skipping in a full waveform inversion method. The method includes receiving recorded seismic data recorded with seismic sensors over a subsurface of interest; selecting a model that describes the subsurface; calculating, based on the model and the recorded seismic data, estimated seismic data; and choosing a probabilistic measure that characterizes a relationship between the recorded seismic data and the estimated seismic data. The probabilistic measure includes at least one statistical function.