Galois Field Sequence Combination for Longer Repetition Periods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for combining data streams in signal processing, error correction codes, and encryption systems face challenges in increasing the repetition period of sequences efficiently, leading to increased implementation complexity and error proneness.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the reception and mapping of number sequences in a Galois field, followed by Galois field multiplication in a Galois extension field to generate an output sequence, ensuring invertible reconstruction and increased repetition period, using Affine transformations and selective digit multiplication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If conventional sequence combination techniques are used to increase repetition period, then the repetition period increases, but implementation complexity significantly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepetition periodVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter space by mapping sequences from a base Galois field GF(p^k) to an extended Galois field GF(p^(2k)), thereby increasing the repetition period through field extension rather than through complex combination logic. This parameter change in the mathematical domain achieves the goal with minimal implementation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or logical combination mechanisms with algebraic operations in Galois fields. By substituting the combination process with field multiplication and affine transformations, the system achieves sequence combination with reduced complexity while maintaining invertibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Duration of action of stationary object

If sequence length is increased to increase repetition period, then repetition period increases, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepetition periodVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing sequence length linearly, the patent changes the field parameter from p^k to p^(2k), achieving a squared increase in repetition period without proportionally increasing processing time. The algebraic structure of Galois fields allows efficient computation even in extended fields.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the problem from one dimension (sequence length) to another dimension (field extension degree). By operating in an extended Galois field, the system achieves longer repetition periods through a different dimensional approach that is more computationally efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Duration of action of stationary object

If multiple orthogonal sequences are combined to increase repetition period, then repetition period increases, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepetition periodVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal combination mechanism that works for any two sequences in a Galois field through affine transformations and field multiplication. This single universal approach replaces the need for multiple specialized combination techniques, reducing resource consumption while achieving the same goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If fixed generating algorithms are used for each sequence period, then implementation is simpler, but adaptability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidalgorithm flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic elements through time-varying affine transformations while maintaining the overall structure of the algorithm. The transformation parameters can change with time or sequence index, providing adaptability without sacrificing the systematic nature of the implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20090044080A1Closed Galois Field Combination
Publication Date: 2009.02.12 HARRIS CORP
  • US20090044080A1 patent drawing
  • US20090044080A1 patent drawing
  • US20090044080A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for combining two or more input sequences in a communications system to increase a repetition period of the input sequences in a resource-efficient manner. The method includes a receiving step, a mapping step, and a generating step. The receiving step involves receiving a first number sequence and a second number sequence, each expressed in a Galois field GF[pk]. The mapping step involves mapping the first and second number sequences to a Galois extension field GF[pk+1]. The generating step involves generating an output sequence by combining the first number sequence with the second number sequence utilizing a Galois field multiplication operation in the Galois extension field GF[pk+1]. p is a prime number. k is an integer. pk+1 defines a finite field size of the Galois extension field GF[pk+1].