Galvanic Measurement Crosstalk Suppression via Complex-Valued Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing borehole resistivity measurement tools face challenges in accurately determining formation resistivity due to interference from inductive and capacitive coupling effects, leading to errors that are larger than the measured signals, especially when the formation resistivity is much larger than the mud resistivity, and limiting the depth of penetration and vertical resolution of measurements.

Innovation Solution

A model-based approach is used to separate interference from the desired measurement by determining resistive and reactive parameters using complex-valued models that account for inductive and capacitive effects, allowing for accurate resistivity determination over a larger range of formation and borehole parameters, and combining this with hardware or software focusing techniques to improve measurement accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional galvanic measurement tools are used to measure formation resistivity, then the measurement can be performed, but the measurement accuracy deteriorates when formation resistivity is much larger than mud resistivity due to inductive and capacitive coupling effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformation resistivity measurement accuracyVSAvoidinductive and capacitive coupling interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement signal is segmented into resistive and reactive components using complex-valued models. The patent separates the measured voltage into real-valued resistive components and imaginary-valued reactive components, allowing independent processing and suppression of interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Complex-valued models serve as intermediaries between the raw measurement data and the final resistivity determination. These models act as a mathematical mediator that accounts for both resistive and reactive effects, enabling accurate separation of interference from the desired measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If hardware or software focusing techniques are applied to improve measurement accuracy, then the vertical resolution and depth of penetration are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical resolution and depth of penetrationVSAvoidhardware and software focusing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the measurement from traditional real-valued voltage measurements to complex-valued measurements, adding the imaginary dimension to capture reactive effects. This dimensional extension enables focusing techniques to operate in a more comprehensive parameter space, improving resolution and penetration depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameters from simple voltage magnitudes to complex-valued voltages with both real and imaginary components. This parameter transformation enables more sophisticated focusing techniques that can account for frequency-dependent effects and improve measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The model-based approach effectively reduces measurement errors and enhances the accuracy of resistivity determination, enabling deeper penetration and improved vertical resolution by separating real-valued resistive components from imaginary-valued reactive components, thus providing more reliable formation resistivity data.

Implementation Method 1

An electrical excitation is coupled from a well tool in a borehole to a geologic formation. Induced voltages resulting from the excitation are received

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

resistivity information may provide a general indication of formation composition or geometry, including providing indicia of invasion or hydrocarbon presence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS9921332B2Crosstalk suppression or removal for galvanic measurements
Publication Date: 2018.03.20 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US9921332B2 patent drawing
  • US9921332B2 patent drawing
  • US9921332B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and techniques are described, such as for obtaining information indicative of a formation resistivity, such as using information from a galvanic measurement apparatus. A resistive parameter related to a geologic formation is estimated through use of a model. An electrical excitation is coupled from a well tool in a borehole to the geologic formation. Induced voltages resulting from the excitation are received using monitor electrodes selected according to the specified excitation mode, including receiving magnitude and phase information corresponding to the induced voltages. The resistive parameter of the model is then determined using the magnitude and phase information of the received voltages, and using magnitude and phase information about the excitation.