Hot-Dip Galvanized Steel Sheet Microstructure for Better Bendability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheets exhibit low bendability, particularly for punched members with large punching clearances, due to stress concentration and crack formation during bending.

Innovation Solution

A high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet is produced by controlling the chemical composition and microstructure, including ferrite and bainite/martensite phases, with average grain sizes and area percentages optimized to reduce stress concentration and improve formability, through a process involving controlled rolling, annealing, and hot-dip galvanizing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional hot-dip galvanized steel sheets are used to ensure formability, then bending cracks are prevented, but tensile strength and elongation are insufficient for advanced high-strength steel requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strength and elongationVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the chemical composition parameters of the steel sheet (tensile strength 980-1500 MPa, total alloying element content 3.5-6.5%, specific ratios of Mn, Si, Al, Ti, Nb, V, B) to achieve both high strength and formability. This resolves the contradiction by finding optimal parameter ranges that satisfy both tensile strength requirements and bending crack prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by creating a multi-phase microstructure consisting of martensite, retained austenite, and bainite phases through controlled alloying and heat treatment. This composite microstructure provides both high strength from martensite and ductility from retained austenite, resolving the strength-formability contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the steel sheet is heated to Ac3 transformation point or higher for microstructure control, then tensile strength and elongation are improved, but bending cracks occur during subsequent bending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strength and elongationVSAvoidbending cracks
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a first heating treatment to Ac3 or higher temperature before final cooling, which transforms the microstructure to austenite. This preliminary transformation enables subsequent controlled cooling to produce the desired martensite-austenite-bainite composite structure, achieving high strength while preventing bending cracks through proper microstructure design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls the heating temperature parameters within specific ranges (Ac3 or higher, but not exceeding 1000°C typically) and combines it with controlled cooling rates to achieve the desired microstructure. This parameter control ensures high strength while maintaining formability by avoiding excessive heating that would cause grain growth and bending cracks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If alloying elements are added to increase tensile strength to 980-1500 MPa, then high strength is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the chemical composition parameters by specifying precise ranges for multiple alloying elements (Mn: 1.50-3.50%, Si: 0.10-3.50%, Al: 0.015-3.00%, Ti: 0.005-0.100%, Nb: 0.005-0.100%, V: 0.005-0.100%, B: 0.0005-0.0050%) to achieve tensile strength of 980-1500 MPa. This systematic parameter optimization balances strength achievement with manufacturing feasibility by avoiding excessive alloying while meeting performance targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting steel sheet achieves significantly improved bendability, suitable for automotive structural members, with a tensile strength of 550 MPa or more and a critical bend radius/thickness ratio of 2.0 or less, enhancing industrial applications.

Implementation Method 1

a first heating treatment is performed on the steel sheet at Ac3 transformation point or higher temperature before a bending operation, and a subsequent cooling operation is performed at a cooling rate of 0.003 to 0.03 sec-1 in the temperature range from Ac3 transformation point to Ms transformation point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

a first heating treatment is performed on the steel sheet at Ac3 transformation point or higher temperature before a bending operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3412788B1High-strength hot-rolled steel sheet and method for producing a high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel
Publication Date: 2021.07.21 JFE STEEL CORP
  • EP3412788B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3412788B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3412788B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and a method for producing the high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet are provided. The steel sheet has a composition including, on a mass percent basis, C: 0.05% to 0.15%, Si: 0.1% or less, Mn: 1.0% to 2.0%, P: 0.10% or less, S: 0.030% or less, Al: 0.10% or less, and N: 0.010% or less, and including one or two or more of Ti, Nb, and V satisfying the formula (1), the remainder being iron and incidental impurities. The steel sheet has a microstructure containing, on an area percent basis, ferrite: 80% or more, and bainite and martensite: 1% to 20% in total. The ferrite has an average grain size of 10.0 µm or less, and a phase containing bainite and martensite has an average grain size of 3.0 µm or less. The ratio of the average grain size of the phase containing bainite and martensite to the average grain size of the ferrite is 0.3 or less. 0.008%≤12×Ti/48+Nb/93+V/51≤0.05% Ti, Nb, and V denote their respective contents (% by mass). In the absence of Ti, Nb, or V, the corresponding content is 0.