Galvanized Steel Sheet Microstructure for Strength and Workability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high-strength steel sheets for automotive parts lack simultaneous high bendability, spot weld crack resistance, stretch-flangeability, and axial compression stability, with existing technologies either prioritizing strength over workability or neglecting spot weld cracking and axial compression stability.

Innovation Solution

A high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet with a specific composition and microstructure, including C, Si, Mn, P, Al, N, Cr, Ti, Nb, Mo, V, and a galvanized layer with Fe content of 6% or more, featuring a microstructure of ferrite, carbide-free bainite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite, and an optimized production process that includes hot-rolling, pickling, cold-rolling, and galvanizing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If higher strength is achieved in steel sheets, then crash safety and fuel efficiency are improved, but workability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidworkability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of the steel sheet by precisely controlling the content ranges of C (0.15-0.35%), Si (0.10-1.00%), Mn (2.00-3.00%), and other alloying elements. This parameter optimization enables the steel to achieve high strength while maintaining good workability, resolving the contradiction between strength and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite microstructure consisting of multiple phases (ferrite, carbide-free bainite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite) with specific area fractions. This composite microstructure combines the advantages of different phases to achieve both high strength and good workability, resolving the contradiction between strength and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If higher strength is achieved in steel sheets, then crash safety is improved, but bendability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidbendability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the chemical composition parameters, particularly C (0.15-0.35%), Si (0.10-1.00%), and Mn (2.00-3.00%), to achieve a balance between strength and bendability. The controlled composition enables high strength while preventing excessive brittleness that would harm bendability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention designs a composite microstructure with ferrite (providing ductility and bendability), tempered martensite (providing strength), and controlled amounts of retained austenite (1-5%) that can transform during deformation to enhance bendability. This composite structure resolves the contradiction between strength and bendability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If higher strength is achieved in steel sheets, then crash safety is improved, but spot weld crack resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidspot weld crack resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention carefully controls the chemical composition parameters, particularly limiting C to 0.15-0.35% and optimizing Si (0.10-1.00%) and Mn (2.00-3.00%), to achieve high strength while maintaining spot weld crack resistance. The balanced composition prevents excessive hardness that would cause welding cracks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality control by optimizing the galvanized layer composition with Fe content of 6% or more, creating a gradient structure that provides both high strength and good weldability at the surface level, resolving the contradiction between strength and spot weld crack resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If higher strength is achieved in steel sheets, then crash safety is improved, but stretch-flangeability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidstretch-flangeability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the chemical composition parameters, particularly C (0.15-0.35%), Si (0.10-1.00%), and Mn (2.00-3.00%), to achieve high strength while maintaining stretch-flangeability. The controlled composition enables the steel to be stretched and formed without excessive cracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite microstructure with ferrite providing ductility for stretching, tempered martensite providing strength, and controlled retained austenite (1-5%) that can transform during deformation to enhance stretch-flangeability. This composite structure resolves the contradiction between strength and stretch-flangeability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Strength

If higher strength is achieved in steel sheets, then crash safety is improved, but axial compression stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidaxial compression stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the chemical composition parameters, particularly C (0.15-0.35%), Si (0.10-1.00%), and Mn (2.00-3.00%), to achieve high strength while maintaining axial compression stability. The balanced composition prevents excessive brittleness that would cause cracking during pleating operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention designs a composite microstructure with ferrite providing ductility, tempered martensite providing strength, and controlled retained austenite (1-5%) that can transform during compression to absorb energy and prevent cracking. This composite structure resolves the contradiction between strength and axial compression stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The steel sheet achieves excellent bendability, spot weld crack resistance, stretch-flangeability, and axial compression stability, making it suitable for demanding automotive applications while maintaining high strength.

Implementation Method 1

the steel microstructure containing ferrite and carbide-free bainite constituting 25% or less (including 0%) by area fraction in total, tempered martensite and carbide-containing bainite constituting 70% to 97% by area fraction in total, martensite and retained austenite constituting 3% to 20% by area fraction in total

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

the galvanized layer being disposed on the steel sheet and has an Fe content of 6% or more by mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentEP3415653B1High-strength galvanized steel sheet and method for producing same
Publication Date: 2020.03.04 JFE STEEL CORP
  • EP3415653B1 patent drawingFigure 1(a)~2
  • EP3415653B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3415653B1 patent drawing

AI summary

There are provided a high-strength galvanized steel sheet with good bendability, spot weld crack resistance, stretch-flangeability, and axial compression stability, and a method for producing the high-strength galvanized steel sheet. The high-strength galvanized steel sheet includes a steel sheet and a particular galvanized layer. The steel sheet has a particular composition and a steel microstructure. The steel microstructure contains ferrite and carbide-free bainite constituting 25% or less (including 0%) by area fraction in total, tempered martensite and carbide-containing bainite constituting 70% to 97% by area fraction in total, martensite and retained austenite constituting 3% to 20% by area fraction in total, and retained austenite constituting 1% to 5% by area fraction. The ferrite, the carbide-free bainite, the martensite, and the retained austenite constitute 3% to 30% by area fraction in total. The retained austenite has a C content in the range of 0.10% to 0.50%. The carbide-containing bainite and the tempered martensite have an average grain size in the range of 5 to 20 µm.