High-Strength Hot-Dip Galvanized Steel Sheet Microstructure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheets face challenges in achieving both high tensile strength and ductility while maintaining in-plane uniformity of material properties, often resulting in defective shapes and non-uniformity due to excessive silicon content and increased rolling loads.

Innovation Solution

A high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet with a chemical composition of C: 0.13-0.25%, Si: 0.01-1.00%, Mn: 1.5-4.0%, and specific microstructural characteristics, including an area fraction of martensite between 60-90%, polygonal ferrite over 5-40%, and retained austenite less than 3%, along with a manufacturing process involving hot rolling, cold rolling, annealing, hot-dip galvanizing, and tempering, to achieve a tensile strength of 1,300 MPa or more.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a large amount of Si is added to increase strength, then tensile strength is improved, but rolling load increases causing defective sheet shape and non-uniformity of material properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidin-plane uniformity of material properties
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the Si content parameter to a specific range (0.01-1.00%) rather than using large amounts, and combines it with controlled Mn content (1.5-4.0%) and specific microstructural parameters (martensite area fraction 60-90%, polygonal ferrite 5-40%). This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by achieving high tensile strength (1300 MPa or more) while maintaining in-plane uniformity of material properties and avoiding defective sheet shapes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If a large amount of alloy elements is added to increase strength, then tensile strength is improved, but manufacturability is impaired and quality deterioration occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidmanufacturability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies precise parameter ranges for alloy elements (C: 0.13-0.25%, Si: 0.01-1.00%, Mn: 1.5-4.0%) and combines them with controlled microstructural parameters (martensite area fraction, polygonal ferrite area fraction, average crystal grain diameter). This comprehensive parameter control achieves high tensile strength (1300 MPa or more) while maintaining good manufacturability and preventing quality deterioration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If high strength is achieved through alloying, then tensile strength is improved, but ductility and in-plane uniformity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidin-plane uniformity of material properties
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite microstructure consisting of multiple phases (martensite with area fraction 60-90%, polygonal ferrite with area fraction 5-40%, and retained austenite less than 3%). This multi-phase composite microstructure, combined with specific alloy composition ranges, achieves high tensile strength (1300 MPa or more) while maintaining excellent ductility and in-plane uniformity of material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a steel sheet with excellent ductility and in-plane uniformity, ensuring high tensile strength and improved manufacturability, reducing the risk of defective shapes and non-uniformity, thus suitable for automobile applications.

Implementation Method 1

the steel sheet having a microstructure including martensite at an area fraction of 60% or more and 90% or less, polygonal ferrite at an area fraction of more than 5% and 40% or less, and less than 3% (including 0%) of retained austenite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

a manufacturing process involving hot rolling, cold rolling, annealing, hot-dip galvanizing, and tempering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnnealing: Annealing

Implementation Method 3

high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheets are expected as steel sheets with excellent corrosion resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHot-dip galvanizing: Electroplating

Data Source

PatentUS10400300B2High-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 JFE STEEL CORP

AI summary

A high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and a method for manufacturing the steel sheet are provided. The high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet has a specific composition including C, Si, Mn, etc. In this chemical composition, the content of Ti [Ti] and the content of N [N] satisfy [Ti]>4[N]. The high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet has a microstructure including martensite at an area fraction of 60% or more and 90% or less, polygonal ferrite at an area fraction of more than 5% and 40% or less, and retained austenite at an area fraction of less than 3% (including 0%). The average hardness of the martensite is 450 or more and 600 or less in terms of Vickers hardness, and the average crystal grain diameter of the martensite is 10 μm or less. The standard deviation of the crystal grain diameters of the martensite is 4.0 μm or less.