Hot Dip Galvannealed Steel Sheet Production Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hot dip galvannealed steel sheets produced by existing methods, such as the Sendzimir method or non-oxidizing furnace method, suffer from reduced workability, elongation, and increased coil break due to high yield strength and solute carbon retention, leading to degraded performance in applications like automobiles.

Innovation Solution

A method involving hot rolling, pickling, cold rolling, continuous annealing, and specific temperature control during galvanization, including preplating with Ni or Ni-Fe without temper rolling, and controlled temperature rises to minimize solute carbon retention and prevent coil break, while maintaining excellent workability and slidability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the Sendzimir method or non-oxidizing furnace method is used to produce hot dip galvannealed steel sheet, then the steel sheet can be produced with standard工艺流程, but the solute C remains in large amount leading to high yield strength and degraded workability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestandard production processVSAvoidworkability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the temperature profile during alloying (heating rate of 20°C/sec or more to 460-550°C, holding for less than 5 seconds, then cooling at 3°C/sec or more) and compositional parameters (C: 0.01-0.12%, Mn: 0.05-0.6%, Si: 0.002-0.1%, sol. Al: 0.005-0.1%) to achieve optimal workability and surface properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing preplating with Ni or Ni-Fe before galvanization, and by controlling the temperature pattern during alloying to prevent excessive carbide precipitation before the final product is obtained

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If temper rolling is performed at 0.6 to 1.5% elongation rate to prevent coil break, then the shape is corrected, but solute C adheres to dislocations causing strain aging and deteriorated workability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape stabilityVSAvoidworkability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces the temper rolling elongation rate from the conventional 0.6-1.5% to 0.4% or less, which is a parameter change that prevents excessive solute C adherence to dislocations while still maintaining shape stability and preventing coil break

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using a minimal temper rolling elongation rate (0.4% or less) that is just sufficient to prevent coil break without causing excessive strain aging, rather than using the full conventional range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If the alloying temperature is raised to 550°C or higher, then the alloying is sufficient, but the workability deteriorates due to strain aging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealloying qualityVSAvoidworkability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent lowers the alloying temperature from the conventional 550°C or higher to 460-550°C, combined with a rapid heating rate (20°C/sec or more) and minimal holding time (less than 5 seconds), achieving sufficient alloying while preventing strain aging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a periodic action pattern in the temperature profile - rapid heating, brief holding, and rapid cooling - which allows sufficient alloying to occur during the brief high-temperature period while minimizing the time for strain aging to develop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Temperature

If the heating rate is slow during alloying, then the temperature can be maintained, but the solute C adheres to dislocations causing strain aging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature stabilityVSAvoidworkability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic action with a rapid heating rate (20°C/sec or more) followed by brief holding (less than 5 seconds) and rapid cooling (3°C/sec or more), which maintains temperature stability during the critical alloying period while minimizing strain aging through the brief exposure time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the skipping principle by rushing through the critical temperature range (460-550°C) as quickly as possible with a heating rate of 20°C/sec or more and holding for less than 5 seconds, minimizing the time solute C can adhere to dislocations while still achieving sufficient alloying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces hot dip galvannealed steel sheets with minimal deterioration in elongation, improved workability, and enhanced powdering and slidability, effectively addressing the limitations of existing production methods.

Implementation Method 1

heating by 5°C/sec or more down to 430 to 500°C, galvanizing in a galvanization bath, wiping, then heating by a rate of temperature rise of 20°C/sec or more up to 460 to 550°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

cooling to 250 to 450°C, holding at said temperature range for 120 seconds or more, then cooling to room temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 3

annealing at 650 to 900°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnnealing: Annealing

Data Source

PatentUS10023931B2Method of production of hot dip galvannealed steel sheet with excellent workability, powderability, and slidability
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US10023931B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method of production of hot dip galvannealed steel sheet with excellent workability compared with the Sendzimir method or non-oxidizing furnace method and further with excellent powdering or slidability, that is, a method of production of hot dip galvannealed steel sheet with excellent workability, powdering, and slidability characterized by processing a slab containing, by mass %, C: 0.01 to 0.12%, Mn: 0.05 to 0.6%, Si: 0.002 to 0.1%, P: 0.05% or less, S: 0.03% or less, sol. Al: 0.005 to 0.1%, and N: 0.01% or less and having a balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities by hot rolling, pickling, cold rolling, then annealing at 650 to 900° C., cooling to 250 to 450° C., holding at said temperature range for 120 seconds or more, then cooling to room temperature, pickling, preplating Ni or Ni—Fe without intermediate temper rolling, heating by 5° C./sec or more down to 430 to 500° C., galvanizing in a galvanization bath, wiping, then heating by a rate of temperature rise of 20° C./sec or more up to 460 to 550° C., not providing any soaking time or holding for soaking for less than 5 seconds, then cooling by 3° C./sec or more, and final temper rolling by a 0.4 to 2% elongation rate.