Game Device Generating Multiple Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Roulette table games fail to provide players with multiple chances to win jackpots within a single game round without delaying the game process or increasing costs, leading to player dissatisfaction and loss of trust.

Innovation Solution

A game device that generates multiple game results based on a processor-controlled system, allowing players to bet and generate multiple outcomes within a specified condition, using the same game result generating unit to save costs and maintain game efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a random accumulative triggering system for jackpot is used to allow players to win multiple times, then players can obtain additional jackpot in a round of the game, but there is an additional cost to design the jackpot game and players need to re-learn the method of playing, which will delay the game process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemultiple jackpot chancesVSAvoidgame process delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the jackpot triggering mechanism with the existing roulette game flow by using the same ball spinning process to generate both regular game results and jackpot opportunities. The system combines multiple game result generations into a single game round, allowing players to win multiple jackpots without learning new mechanics or experiencing game delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The game result generating unit is designed to perform multiple functions: it generates regular roulette results, triggers jackpot games, and provides multiple winning opportunities within a single round. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate jackpot game mechanisms and reduces operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If dynamic odds of raise are used to attract players, then there is no delay in the game process, but in order to control the players' recovery rate to ensure that the operator retains the deserved profit, a quantity of the dynamic odds of raise cannot be effectively increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegame process efficiencyVSAvoidodds increase quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of game results generated based on real-time conditions. The processor determines whether to generate one or multiple game results based on random determination and accumulated bet amounts, creating dynamic odds that adapt to player behavior while maintaining operator profit margins through controlled recovery rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of game result quantity from fixed to variable. The system can generate one or multiple game results based on predetermined conditions, effectively changing the odds parameter dynamically while maintaining overall house edge through controlled parameter adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If the same game result generating unit is used to generate multiple game results, then costs are saved and game efficiency is improved, but the processor must control and manage multiple result generations within a single round

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost reductionVSAvoidprocessor control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the game result generation process into distinct controllable steps: determining whether to generate multiple results, generating the results, and processing payouts. This segmentation simplifies the processor's control logic by breaking down the complex task of managing multiple result generations into manageable segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The game result generating unit operates autonomously under processor direction, generating results based on predetermined conditions without requiring complex real-time intervention. The system uses random determination and accumulated bet amounts as triggering mechanisms that automatically initiate result generation, reducing the burden on the processor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12008865B2Game device capable of generating a plurality of game results by betting
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 HSU TIEN SHU
  • US12008865B2 patent drawing
  • US12008865B2 patent drawing
  • US12008865B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A game device capable of generating a plurality of game results by betting, including a betting tabletop, an imaging unit, a game result generating unit, a compensation unit, and a processor. The processor determines whether a game satisfies a specified condition and then decides whether to generate an overweight signal and makes the game result generating unit generate a specified number of game results when the overweight signal exists, and the specified number is greater than 1. On this basis, in a round game, the plurality of game results can be generated by means of the game result generating unit, to satisfy the requirements of a player for obtaining a plurality of game results by a bet, the running of the game is accelerated, and the operating efficiency of the game is increased.