Game Event Scoring Magnification for User Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing online game events fail to effectively incentivize users to achieve gameplay metrics, leading to reduced engagement and revenue, as current methods do not sufficiently magnify achievement values during event periods.

Innovation Solution

A system that temporarily modifies gameplay metric values during event periods, using a server-based architecture with modules like event scoring and award distribution to enhance user engagement by magnifying achievement values and rewarding users with the greatest relative increases, thereby encouraging participation and spending on virtual items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If gameplay metric values are magnified during event periods to incentivize user participation, then user engagement and achievement completion increase, but system complexity increases due to temporary modifications and award distribution mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically modifies gameplay metric values during event periods by implementing temporary magnification multipliers. The event scoring module adjusts metric calculations in real-time based on event status, allowing the system to adapt incentives without permanent structural changes. This dynamic approach enables high user engagement during events while maintaining system flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic event periods during which gameplay metric magnification is activated. These time-bound events create structured incentives that periodically engage users without requiring continuous system complexity. The periodic nature allows the system to reset and maintain simplicity between events while achieving high engagement during active periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If gameplay metric values are temporarily magnified to encourage achievement completion, then user participation increases, but the determination and tracking of metrics becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveachievement completion rateVSAvoidmetric determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The event scoring module serves as an intermediary layer between the standard scoring module and the gameplay metrics. It intercepts metric calculations, applies temporary magnification factors during events, and returns adjusted values. This intermediary approach simplifies the implementation of complex metric modifications by centralizing the logic in a dedicated module rather than dispersing it throughout the scoring system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter values of gameplay metrics temporarily during event periods by applying magnification multipliers. Instead of modifying the fundamental metric determination logic, the system adjusts the numerical parameters (multipliers) applied to metric values. This allows flexible control over achievement incentives while maintaining the underlying metric determination simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If awards are distributed based on greatest relative increase in gameplay metrics, then user motivation is enhanced, but the evaluation and ranking process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser motivationVSAvoidevaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The event evaluation module implements feedback mechanisms that track user progress toward event objectives and calculate relative increases in gameplay metrics. By providing continuous feedback on user standing and progress during events, the system enhances motivation through visible progress tracking and competitive ranking, while the automated calculation processes manage the evaluation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies or representations of the complex evaluation process by implementing standardized algorithms for calculating relative increases and determining rankings. These algorithmic copies automate the evaluation of multiple users' metric increases, reducing manual complexity while maintaining accurate motivation-based award distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10252150B1Method and system for temporarily incentivizing user participation in a game space
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 ELECTRONIC ARTS INC
  • US10252150B1 patent drawing
  • US10252150B1 patent drawing
  • US10252150B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for temporarily altering the determination of gameplay metric values in a game space, and distributing awards based on the relative change in gameplay metric values during the temporary time.