Game Prize Spending Enforcement System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gaming systems do not enforce a time limit for spending prizes won, allowing winners to freely choose how and when to spend their winnings, which does not align with the 'Brewster's Millions' concept of spending within a set time frame and having no assets remaining.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method where winners of online games, particularly tournament-style games, must spend their prizes within a set time limit, with monitoring to ensure compliance, and rules that stipulate no assets should be left after expenditure, optionally allowing a proportion to be spent on assets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If winners are free to choose how and when to spend their prizes, then flexibility and ease of operation are improved, but the entertainment value and engagement are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in spending choicesVSAvoidentertainment value
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic time limits that adjust based on the winner's spending rate. The system monitors expenditure in real-time and modifies the remaining time accordingly, creating a living challenge that adapts to player behavior. This dynamic adjustment maintains entertainment value while preserving spending flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the time parameter dynamically during the spending period. Instead of a fixed deadline, the system adjusts the time limit based on spending velocity, allowing winners to experience varying levels of pressure. This parameter change creates an engaging narrative arc while maintaining operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If a strict time limit with no assets remaining is enforced, then entertainment value and alignment with Brewster's Millions concept are improved, but complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentertainment valueVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors spending, calculates remaining time adjustments, and enforces rules without requiring manual intervention. The automated monitoring system tracks transactions in real-time, adjusts time limits dynamically, and determines compliance, reducing operational complexity while maintaining strict enforcement of entertainment rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors spending patterns and provides real-time feedback to winners about their progress toward meeting the challenge requirements. This feedback loop includes information about remaining time, spending rate, and projected compliance, enabling winners to self-regulate while the system maintains automated oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If monitoring of prize expenditure is implemented, then compliance with time limits and rules is improved, but loss of time for administrative tasks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance monitoringVSAvoidadministrative time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual monitoring mechanisms with automated electronic systems. The monitoring system uses software to track transactions, calculate compliance, and enforce rules automatically, eliminating the need for human administrators to manually review each expenditure and significantly reducing administrative time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an automated intermediary monitoring layer that sits between the winner's spending activities and the rule enforcement process. This intermediary automatically validates transactions against rules, determines compliance without human intervention, and only requires minimal administrative time for exception handling and system maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If winners must spend all or most of the prize with no assets remaining, then alignment with Brewster's Millions concept is improved, but adaptability of the system decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment with conceptVSAvoidflexibility in expenditure rules
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements flexible proportions that require winners to spend a specified percentage or amount of their prize, rather than mandating complete exhaustion. This partial action approach allows the system to maintain alignment with the core Brewster's Millions concept while adapting to different game types, prize amounts, and regulatory requirements through configurable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7867082B2Game and prizing method
Publication Date: 2011.01.11 PARTYGAMING IA LTD
  • US7867082B2 patent drawing
  • US7867082B2 patent drawing
  • US7867082B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A game and prize method includes a prize awarded to a winner of a game, and the prize must be spent by the winner within a certain set time limit. However, in order to obtain the prize a player must participate in a game, preferably a tournament style game, with other people, and win the prize. The game may be against the other contestants in a knock-out style game, or may alternatively be against a computer, with a selection of one of the contestants being made based on random or deterministic criteria. However the winner is determined, the winner receives a money prize which must then be spent by the winner within a set time limit.