Gaming Machine Fee Refund Logic Under Responsible Gaming Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems impose financial transaction fees that deter users from transferring funds to gaming establishments, and there is a need to minimize the psychological impact of these fees while ensuring compliance with responsible gaming limitations.

Innovation Solution

A system that tracks gaming machine activities and, if a threshold is reached, determines a refund of fees based on responsible gaming limitations, using cashless transfers and ticket vouchers to reduce the impact of fees on users.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If transaction fees are imposed on fund transfers to gaming establishments, then financial institution fees are collected, but user participation is deterred and psychological impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction feesVSAvoiduser participation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful effect of transaction fees into a beneficial mechanism by implementing a fee refund program. Fees collected during fund transfers are refunded to users based on their gaming activity levels and responsible gaming parameters, transforming the negative psychological impact into a positive incentive structure that encourages cashless transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the fee refund parameters based on user gaming activity, win/loss ratios, and responsible gaming limitations. By changing the refund amount as a function of gaming parameters, the system optimizes both fee recovery for the financial institution and user participation incentives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If cashless transfers are implemented, then cash handling is reduced and security is enhanced, but transaction fees are imposed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtransaction fees
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful fee impact into a beneficial feedback mechanism by refunding fees based on gaming performance and responsible gaming parameters. This incentivizes users to prefer cashless transfers, thereby enhancing security and reducing cash handling while offsetting the fee burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where transaction fees are refunded to users based on their gaming activity outcomes and responsible gaming compliance. This feedback mechanism encourages continued use of secure cashless transfer methods while compensating users for the fees incurred.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If fee refunds are provided to users, then psychological impact of fees is minimized, but responsible gaming limitations must be enforced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidresponsible gaming compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to monitor gaming activity, win/loss ratios, and responsible gaming compliance parameters. Based on this feedback, the system automatically determines fee refund eligibility and amounts, providing a personalized user experience while enforcing responsible gaming limitations through automated parameter checking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The fee refund system is dynamic, adjusting refund amounts and eligibility in real-time based on changing gaming parameters and responsible gaming compliance status. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain user-friendly experiences while adapting to varying responsible gaming requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250363472A1Responsible gaming limitations and electronic gaming machine activity employed to refund financial institution fees
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250363472A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363472A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363472A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods that enable a transfer of funds from an external account to an electronic gaming machine, track a quantity of occurrences of an activity associated with the electronic gaming machine, and if the tracked quantity of occurrences of the activity at least reaches a threshold quantity of occurrences, determine, based on whether or not an identified user of the electronic gaming machine is associated with any responsible gaming limitations, an amount of a refund of an assessed fee from the transfer.