Gaming Patron Verification Through Automated Eligibility Scanning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gaming systems require time-consuming and costly manual patron verification, such as age verification by attendants, which discourages patrons from placing bets on age-restricted games due to limited payout methods.

Innovation Solution

A gaming device utilizes computing technology to verify patron eligibility through identification scanning, mobile device data transmission, facial recognition, and machine learning algorithms to determine properties like age or identity, and dispense lottery tickets or prizes based on verification success.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual patron verification by attendants is used, then verification accuracy is improved, but operational cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical verification processes with automated electronic systems. Specifically, it uses barcode scanning devices to read patron identification, mobile device communication to transmit verification data, and computer systems to automatically compare patron information against restricted lists. This substitution eliminates the need for manual inspection while maintaining verification accuracy and significantly reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables patrons to participate in their own verification process by having them present identification with barcodes that can be scanned, and by utilizing mobile devices that can communicate verification data. This self-service approach reduces the burden on attendants and accelerates the verification process while maintaining accuracy through automated comparison systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual patron verification by attendants is used, then verification accuracy is improved, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical verification processes with automated electronic systems. Specifically, it uses barcode scanning devices to read patron identification, mobile device communication to transmit verification data, and computer systems to automatically compare patron information against restricted lists. This substitution eliminates the need for manual inspection while maintaining verification accuracy and significantly reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses barcode copies of patron identification information stored on patron cards and mobile devices. Instead of manually examining physical identification documents, the system scans and reads barcode representations of the patron's information, automatically comparing these copies against restricted lists. This copying mechanism maintains verification accuracy while eliminating the need for costly manual review processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If automated verification systems are used, then operational efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the verification system into distinct functional segments: barcode scanning devices for data capture, mobile devices for data transmission, computer systems for data processing and comparison, and databases for storing restricted lists. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while reducing overall system complexity through modular design and clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multi-functional components that can handle various verification tasks. For example, the computer system can compare patron information against multiple different restricted lists (age restrictions, prohibited persons, etc.), and the barcode scanning system can read various types of identification formats. This universality reduces system complexity by using versatile components rather than specialized ones for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250246044A1Patron verification systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 PRIMERO GAMES LLC
  • US20250246044A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246044A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246044A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The gaming device can generate an outcome for a wagering game. The outcome can include multiple indicia or symbols positioned on a pay line. The gaming device can determine that a particular combination of indicia are positioned on a pay line. In response, the gaming device can determine a property associated with the current patron. The gaming device can determine if the property meets or exceeds a predetermined threshold. In response to the property meeting or exceeding the threshold, the gaming device can provide a lottery ticket to the current patron. In response to the property failing to meet the threshold, the gaming device can provide a prize.