GAN-Based CT Reconstruction with Gradient Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CT super-resolution methods rely on simulated or phantom image pairs, leading to poor performance in real clinical settings due to misalignment and require increased scanning time and radiation dose, which are not suitable for direct application in clinical environments.

Innovation Solution

A GAN-based framework with gradient guidance that uses clinical data pairs and incorporates a gradient guidance branch to directly learn the mapping for ultra-high resolution CT image reconstruction, employing a hybrid loss function combining pixel-wise, perceptual, and adversarial losses to generate reliable anatomical structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If hardware-oriented methods are used to improve spatial resolution, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases and object-affected harmful factors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidscanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces hardware-oriented mechanical resolution improvement methods with a deep learning-based image processing system. The neural network model processes existing CT images to enhance spatial resolution without requiring additional scanning time or hardware modifications, thus resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and loss of time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of image resolution through software-based deep learning processing rather than hardware adjustments. The neural network model transforms low-resolution CT images into high-resolution images by learning from training data, achieving resolution improvement without increasing scanning time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If hardware-oriented methods are used to improve spatial resolution, then manufacturing precision is improved, but object-affected harmful factors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidradiation dose
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes hardware-based resolution enhancement that requires increased radiation dose with a software-based deep learning approach. The neural network model enhances image quality by processing existing images, eliminating the need for additional radiation exposure while maintaining improved spatial resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If deep learning based super-resolution methods are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to poor performance in real clinical settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidclinical performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by extensively training the neural network model on large datasets of paired low-resolution and high-resolution CT images before deployment. This pre-training on diverse clinical data ensures the model generalizes well to real-world scenarios, improving reliability while maintaining high resolution enhancement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms through loss functions that compare generated high-resolution images with ground truth images during training. This feedback loop continuously optimizes the model to produce clinically accurate results, ensuring reliability in real-world applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If conventional super-resolution methods are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of information increases due to fake details

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoiddetail accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses perceptual loss and adversarial loss as feedback mechanisms during training to ensure generated high-frequency details are anatomically accurate rather than fabricated. The adversarial network component specifically targets the generation of realistic textures and structures, reducing information loss by preventing fake detail generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240221115A1Ultra-high resolution CT reconstruction using gradient guidance
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 SUBTLE MEDICAL INC
  • US20240221115A1 patent drawing
  • US20240221115A1 patent drawing
  • US20240221115A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method is provided for ultra-high resolution computed tomography. The method comprises: acquiring, using computed tomography (CT), a medical image of a subject, the medical image has a lower resolution; and processing the medical image, with aid of a deep learning network model, to reconstruct an ultra-high resolution medical image, where the deep learning network model is trained using a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based framework with a gradient guidance.