GAN Process Parameter Prediction for Semiconductor Fabrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The semiconductor manufacturing industry faces challenges in reducing development time and costs due to the time-consuming and expensive trial-and-error approach in determining process parameters for semiconductor device fabrication, which slows down research and development and increases the time to market.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a neural network module configured with a generative adversarial network that generates process parameters for semiconductor devices based on device design files and material properties, incorporating an imaging system for additional training, thereby reducing the need for conventional trial-and-error methods and optimizing process parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a trial-and-error approach is used to determine process parameters, then process parameters can be determined through systematic testing, but development time and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess parameter accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the semiconductor fabrication process through a trained neural network model. Instead of physically testing parameters on real wafers, the system copies the fabrication process in silico using the trained model, which has learned the complex relationships between process parameters and outcomes from historical data. This virtual copying eliminates the need for time-consuming physical trial-and-error while maintaining parameter determination accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of the neural network model using historical fabrication data before actual parameter determination is needed. This preliminary action involves feeding the model extensive historical process data and outcomes, allowing it to learn optimal parameter relationships in advance. When actual parameter determination is required, the pre-trained model can quickly predict optimal parameters without needing to perform physical experiments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If a trial-and-error approach is used to determine process parameters, then process parameters can be determined through systematic testing, but research and development costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess parameter accuracyVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical material consumption with virtual simulation. The trained neural network model creates a digital twin of the fabrication process, allowing parameter optimization to be performed in the virtual domain. This copying approach eliminates the need to consume actual semiconductor materials, chemicals, and equipment time during the parameter determination phase, while still achieving accurate parameter identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses historical fabrication data that has already been collected during normal production to train the neural network model. This self-service approach means the system learns from its own past operations without requiring additional external resources or materials. The historical data serves dual purposes: it represents past material consumption that already occurred, and it provides the training fuel for the AI model that will eliminate future material waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional methods are used to determine process parameters, then parameters can be optimized through experimentation, but time to market increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess parameter optimizationVSAvoidtime to market
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of physical experimentation with an information-based system. Instead of mechanically adjusting parameters and observing physical outcomes, the system uses information processing through the neural network model. The model processes historical data patterns and predicts optimal parameters computationally, substituting the slow mechanical trial-and-error process with rapid information analysis and prediction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system fundamentally changes the approach from continuous physical parameter adjustment to discrete computational parameter prediction. The neural network model has learned the optimal parameter values or relationships from historical data, allowing it to directly predict suitable parameters for new fabrication scenarios without needing to physically explore the parameter space through experimentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12131103B2Semiconductor fabrication process parameter determination using a generative adversarial network
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 KLA CORP
  • US12131103B2 patent drawing
  • US12131103B2 patent drawing
  • US12131103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device design file and material properties are inputted into a neural network module configured to operate a generative adversarial network. A process parameter is determined based on a device design file and material properties inputs using the generative adversarial network. This can be used to provide process parameters during semiconductor device design or manufacturing.