Multi-Channel Pulse Current Generator with GaN Charging Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multi-channel current pulse generators with floating gate drivers are complex, expensive, and area-intensive, making it difficult to fit unique laser drivers close to the laser diode array in systems like lidar, which increases inductance, turn-on time, and power consumption, and limits the duration of current pulses.

Innovation Solution

A circuit with a single, ground-referenced pulse control transistor and load capacitors, using gallium nitride (GaN) FETs, where each channel has a charging control transistor that directs charging currents to load capacitors based on a control signal, eliminating the need for floating gate drivers and allowing independent control of each load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If floating gate drivers are used to control n-type FETs in multi-channel current pulse generators, then precise control of current pulses is achieved, but device complexity, area, and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent pulse control precisionVSAvoiddriver circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the charging function from the traditional floating gate driver and implements it separately using dedicated charging control transistors and capacitors. Each channel has its own charging control transistor that independently controls the charging current to the capacitor, separating the charging function from the pulse control function. This reduces the complexity of the pulse control transistor while maintaining precise current pulse control through the combination of charging control and pulse control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If floating gate drivers are implemented in multi-channel current pulse generators, then individual load control is enabled, but area and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual load control capabilityVSAvoidcircuit area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the driver circuit into distinct functional blocks: charging control transistors, pulse control transistors, and capacitors for each channel. Each channel has its own charging control transistor and capacitor, allowing independent control of charging and pulsing functions. This segmentation enables individual load control while reducing area by eliminating the need for complex floating gate driver circuits in each channel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If components are placed further from the laser diode array to reduce complexity, then device complexity decreases, but inductance and turn-on time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver circuit complexityVSAvoidturn-on time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the charging control transistor and pulse control transistor into a single integrated control structure for each channel. The charging control transistor and pulse control transistor are positioned close to the laser diode array, combining multiple control functions in a compact arrangement. This merging reduces the overall inductance by minimizing the distance between control elements and the laser diode while maintaining low complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If conventional floating gate drivers are used, then current pulse control is achieved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent pulse control precisionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic charging of capacitors through charging control transistors, where capacitors are charged during idle periods and then discharged to generate current pulses. This periodic charging approach allows the system to maintain precise current pulse control capability while reducing average power consumption, as the high-current pulse path is active only during brief pulse intervals rather than continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11687110B2Multi-channel pulse current generator with charging
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 EFFICIENT POWER CONVERSION CORP
  • US11687110B2 patent drawing
  • US11687110B2 patent drawing
  • US11687110B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-channel current pulse generator for driving a plurality of loads with unique positive terminals and a shared negative terminal. The pulse generator comprises a pulse control transistor and, for each load, a load capacitor and a charging control transistor. The pulse control transistor allows or blocks current pulses through the loads and has a drain terminal connected to the shared negative terminal, a source terminal connected to ground, and a gate terminal for receiving a load driver control signal. The load capacitors are discharged by current pulses through the corresponding loads. The charging control transistors allow or block charging currents for the corresponding load capacitors. The pulse control transistor is preferably an enhancement mode GaN FET and is chosen to withstand current pulses through a maximum number of loads to be driven simultaneously.