Gantry Crossbeam Cross-Coupling Control for Load-Sync Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing synchronization algorithms for CNC machine tools fail to account for changes in the center of gravity of the crossbeam due to moving parts, leading to significant synchronization errors and reduced machining accuracy and dynamic response.

Innovation Solution

A cross-coupling control method is implemented, involving a crossbeam dynamics model, PID control parameter adjustment, and a disturbance observer to compensate for synchronization errors and improve system robustness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing synchronization algorithms are used for CNC systems, then the control system is simple, but the synchronization error increases due to not considering center of gravity changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a crossbeam dynamics model in advance that incorporates the movement of parts on the crossbeam and resulting center of gravity changes. This preliminary modeling allows the system to predict and compensate for synchronization errors before they occur, rather than reacting to them afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements cross-coupling synchronous control that provides feedback on the mutual influence between the two axes driving the crossbeam. The disturbance observer continuously monitors synchronization errors and feeds this information back to adjust control outputs, thereby compensating for center of gravity changes and improving synchronization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If cross-coupling synchronous control with disturbance observer is implemented, then synchronization accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a disturbance observer as an intermediary component that mediates between the complex dynamics of the crossbeam system and the control system. The observer estimates disturbances caused by center of gravity changes and provides compensation signals, simplifying the overall control architecture while maintaining high synchronization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts control parameters dynamically based on the operating conditions and center of gravity position. By changing control parameters adaptively rather than using fixed parameters, the system achieves high synchronization accuracy across different operating conditions without requiring an excessively complex control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the movement of parts on crossbeam is not considered, then the control model is simple, but machining accuracy decreases due to synchronization errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoiddynamics model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates the movement of parts on the crossbeam into the dynamics model in advance. By preliminarily considering these movements and their effect on center of gravity, the model accurately predicts synchronization errors that would otherwise degrade machining accuracy, allowing for proactive compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-coupling synchronous control with disturbance observer provides continuous feedback on the actual synchronization performance. This feedback mechanism detects deviations caused by neglected dynamics and adjusts control outputs in real-time, ensuring machining accuracy is maintained despite the complexity of the underlying dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12383997B2Cross-coupling control method for moving beam of gantry machine tool
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 JILIN UNIVERSITY
  • US12383997B2 patent drawing
  • US12383997B2 patent drawing
  • US12383997B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cross-coupling control method for moving beam of gantry machine tool is disclosed, which relates to the technical field of CNC machine tool control. The cross-coupling control method includes: Step 1: establishing a crossbeam dynamics model considering a ram on the crossbeam, and at the same time simplifying the model for an observer design; step 2: realizing a PID control parameter adjustment of motors at both ends in accordance with a method of parameter tuning of a unilateral servo control system; using a servo system with the same control parameters to jointly drive the crossbeam up and down, realizing the synchronous control and realizing PID control parameter tuning for both end motors. The disclosure not only reduces the synchronization error caused by the torsion of the crossbeam, but also solves the synchronization error caused by the asymmetric load on both sides, and improves the system robustness and stability.