Gantry Item Transfer for Flexible Robotic Palletizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional order fulfillment systems in storage facilities rely heavily on human labor, which can be inefficient during peak demand periods and require significant facility modifications for automation, leading to operational challenges and reduced flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A robotic system with a gantry and extendable arms is used to transfer items between support surfaces, allowing for autonomous order collection and palletization without major facility rearrangement, integrating with human workers to optimize efficiency and flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If human labor is used for order fulfillment, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate during peak demand periods

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system serves as an intermediary between storage locations and packing stations, handling item retrieval and transport while human workers focus on packing and order assembly. This mediator approach allows the system to combine robotic efficiency in movement with human dexterity in packing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The order fulfillment process is segmented into distinct tasks: robotic systems handle item retrieval, transport, and placement, while human workers handle packing and order assembly. This segmentation allows each component to optimize for its specific function, improving overall system efficiency while maintaining human flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If automation is implemented in storage facilities, then productivity is improved, but device complexity and facility modification requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic systems are designed with multi-functionality to perform various tasks including item retrieval, transport, and precise placement at packing stations. This universality reduces the need for specialized equipment for each function, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic systems autonomously navigate storage facilities, locate items, retrieve them, and deliver them to appropriate packing stations without human intervention. This self-service capability reduces the complexity of control systems and infrastructure modifications needed compared to centralized automated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If full automation is deployed, then productivity increases, but ease of operation and human involvement decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment efficiencyVSAvoidhuman worker involvement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of full automation, the system implements partial automation where robotic systems handle specific tasks (retrieval and transport) while human workers continue to perform other tasks (packing and assembly). This partial automation approach maintains human involvement and operational simplicity while still achieving productivity improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system acts as an intermediary that assists rather than replaces human workers, bringing items to packing stations where humans complete the order fulfillment process. This intermediary role preserves human involvement and operational simplicity while enhancing overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250368446A1Transferring Items Between Two Support Surfaces
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 PROPICK IP LLC
  • US20250368446A1 patent drawing
  • US20250368446A1 patent drawing
  • US20250368446A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a general aspect, a robotic system is disclosed for transferring items between two support surfaces, for example, from a storage surface to a pallet for transport. The robotic system includes a base that contacts a ground surface and includes a pallet handling unit. A vertical frame is supported by the base and includes four vertical beams that each extend from the base. Moreover, a gantry is supported by the vertical frame and includes a gantry frame that is movably coupled to the four vertical beams. The gantry is configured to translate an extendable arm horizontally along the gantry frame in a first direction between a storage region and a picking region. The extendable arm includes a gripping mechanism and is configured to extend and retract horizontally in a second direction between an extended position and a retracted position. The second direction is perpendicular to the first direction.