Gantry Restocking Robots With Mobile Safety Barriers in Retail Aisles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated retail store environments face inefficiencies and safety concerns due to the need for disparate information sources and manual intervention in restocking and operational tasks, which hinder the realization of economic benefits from retail automation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of robotic systems that integrate various data sources for safe, reliable, and efficient restocking and operational safety, including gantry robots for transferring items, mobile barrier robots for space restriction, and barrier devices for secure storage access, all controlled by sensors and controllers for autonomous operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual transfer of items by store workers is used, then flexibility in handling various items is maintained, but safety concerns and inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through autonomous robotic mechanisms that automatically monitor inventory levels via sensors and transfer items from storage locations to POS locations without human intervention. The robot controller independently makes decisions about when and what to restock, eliminating the need for manual worker intervention while maintaining continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations by workers are replaced with an automated robotic system comprising a gantry robot, robot controller, and sensor network. The robotic mechanism uses automated control systems and sensors to perform item transfer operations, substituting human physical labor with mechanized automation that improves both safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If disparate information sources are used for restocking, then comprehensive data collection is achieved, but system complexity and integration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple information sources including sensor data from the robotic system, inventory management system data, and point-of-sale system data into a unified control framework. The robot controller integrates these disparate data sources to make coordinated restocking decisions, reducing information loss while managing system complexity through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot controller serves multiple functions: it controls gantry robot movements, processes sensor data for inventory monitoring, receives restocking requests from the inventory management system, and coordinates with the point-of-sale system. This multi-functional design consolidates complex operations into a single intelligent control unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Volume of stationary object

If customer-inaccessible storage locations are used above aisles, then storage capacity is increased, but access difficulty and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidaccessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The gantry robot acts as an intermediary mechanism between the customer-inaccessible storage locations above aisles and the customer-accessible POS locations. It automatically retrieves items from elevated storage and delivers them to accessible points, eliminating the need for manual access to dangerous heights while maintaining storage capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from horizontal item access at customer level to vertical storage utilization above aisles. The gantry robot operates in the vertical dimension, moving items from elevated storage locations down to accessible points, effectively utilizing three-dimensional space to increase storage capacity without compromising accessibility through automated retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If automated robotic systems are implemented, then operational efficiency is improved, but initial system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is segmented into distinct functional modules: sensor units for inventory monitoring, gantry robot for item transfer, robot controller for coordination, and integration interfaces for existing systems. This modular segmentation reduces overall system complexity by breaking down the automated restocking function into manageable, independent components that can be implemented and maintained separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11293152B2Robotic restocking and safety systems for automated retail store environments
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US11293152B2 patent drawing
  • US11293152B2 patent drawing
  • US11293152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and software are provided for automated item restocking using gantry robots and establishing safety barriers for retail work operation spaces in retail store environments. Robot controllers in communication with the gantry robots and barrier robots direct the autonomous movements thereof for transferring items between customer-accessible point of sale locations and customer-inaccessible storage, and for alternately restricting and enabling access to work operation spaces, respectively.