Gantry Machine Tool Layout With Coplanar Walkable Supports

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gantry machine tools pose safety risks and accessibility issues for operators due to elevated support structures, complex protection systems, and increased installation and maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A gantry machine tool design featuring support structures that are coplanar with the worktable, allowing for a completely walkable lower portion, reduced overall dimensions, and simplified protection systems, thereby enhancing safety and accessibility while lowering costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If support structures are anchored to the floor in a raised position, then the machine structure is stable and robust, but operator safety deteriorates due to increased falling risks and injury exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidoperator safety
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The support structures are designed to be coplanar with the worktable, creating an equipotential surface at operating height. This eliminates height differences and stepped obstacles, allowing operators to move freely between the support structures and worktable without falling risks, while maintaining structural stability through the embedded longitudinal support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If fixed or movable barricades are positioned near support structures, then operator safety is improved by preventing access, but accessibility deteriorates as operators cannot easily reach the worktable for routine operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidaccessibility to worktable
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By making the support structures coplanar with the worktable, the invention creates a continuous walkable surface that eliminates the need for barricades. Operators can safely access the worktable for routine operations by simply walking across the coplanar support structures, which are designed to bear operational loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

3Reliability

If telescopic covers or roller shutters are used to protect guide means, then protection is provided, but device complexity increases and walkability deteriorates as these covers are slippery and cannot bear operator weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of guide meansVSAvoidprotection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the telescopic covers or roller shutters from the system. Instead of adding protective covers, the guide means are integrated directly into the coplanar support structures, allowing the support structures themselves to serve as both structural elements and protective surfaces that can bear operator weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If different heights and protection systems are implemented, then guide means are protected, but accessibility deteriorates as wheeled lifting means cannot easily access the worktable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of guide meansVSAvoidaccess with wheeled lifting means
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The coplanar design creates an equipotential surface that allows wheeled lifting means to move freely between the support structures and worktable without encountering height differences or obstacles, while the integrated guide means provide necessary protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

5Ease of operation

If gangways with ladders are installed to allow operator access, then accessibility is improved, but device complexity and costs increase due to additional installation and maintenance requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator accessibilityVSAvoidaccess system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the need for gangways with ladders by making the support structures themselves coplanar with the worktable. The support structures are designed to be directly walkable, removing the need for separate access systems and reducing installation and maintenance costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250153290A1Improved gantry machine tool
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 HPT SINERGY SRL
  • US20250153290A1 patent drawing
  • US20250153290A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A gantry machine tool includes a pair of vertical uprights joined atop by a transverse beam, on which a tool holder head is slidingly mounted, and a worktable for anchoring a workpiece, above which the tool holder head is movable. Each upright includes a carriage adapted to slide along a longitudinal support structure, which includes a horizontal surface coplanar to the worktable and a lateral surface embedded in the floor and having a guide system for the carriage.