Gantry Turning Center Layout for Chip Collection and Small-Batch Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current numerically controlled turning centers face inefficiencies in machining operations due to difficulties in chip collection and limited versatility, particularly when handling both large and small workpieces, leading to suboptimal utilization and extended amortization times for machines.

Innovation Solution

A numerically controlled turning center design featuring a load-bearing gantry structure with optimized movement axes, retractable support and rotation units, and multiple machining heads with independent movements, allowing for efficient chip collection and simultaneous machining of workpieces of varying sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a turning center is sized to machine large workpieces, then it can handle large workpieces, but it operates below capacity when machining smaller workpieces, extending amortization time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece size adaptabilityVSAvoidmachine utilization rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The turning center is divided into modular components: a fixed headstock, a movable tailstock carried by a slide, and multiple machining heads. This segmentation allows the tailstock and machining heads to be repositioned along the bed to accommodate workpieces of varying lengths, enabling both large and small workpieces to be machined efficiently on the same machine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tailstock is designed to be movable along the bed via a slide mechanism, and machining heads can be selectively positioned. This dynamic configuration allows the machine to adapt its working length and tool positions according to the size of the workpiece, maintaining high utilization rates whether machining large or small components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If support and rotation members are positioned far apart to machine large workpieces, then large workpieces can be accommodated, but chip collection becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece size capacityVSAvoidchip collection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A chip collection system is introduced as an intermediary element between the machining zone and the collection container. This system efficiently channels chips generated during machining operations into collection containers, solving the chip collection problem regardless of the distance between support members or the size of the workpiece being machined.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple machining operations are required, then workpiece versatility increases, but machining cycle length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining operation varietyVSAvoidmachining cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple machining heads with different tools are combined on the same movable carriage, allowing multiple machining operations (turning, grooving, threading, etc.) to be performed on a workpiece during a single setup. The workpiece rotates once while different tools are brought into position to perform sequential operations, significantly reducing machining cycle time compared to traditional methods requiring multiple setups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The machining process is designed to be continuous, with multiple tools available on the movable carriage allowing operations to proceed without stopping the workpiece rotation. The carriage moves along the workpiece length, and tools are selectively engaged to perform different operations in sequence, maintaining continuous useful action throughout the machining cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3851244B1A numerically controlled turning center with a gantry structure
Publication Date: 2022.11.30 PAOLINO BACCI SRL
  • EP3851244B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3851244B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3851244B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The numerically controlled turning center (1) comprises a load-bearing gantry structure (3), with a horizontal cross member (7) and two uprights (5). A first slide (11) is movable along the cross member (7) according to a first numerically controlled translation axis (X) and carries a machining head (13, 15, 17) with a downward facing rotary tool (13.1, 15.1, 17.1) for chip removal machining. A second slide (31) is positioned under the cross member (7) and movable along a second numerically controlled translation axis (Z) and mounted on which is a support and rotation unit (19), which comprises support and rotation members (21, 23) for a workpiece to be machined (PI, P2, P), aligned with each other along a rotation axis (A1) parallel to the cross member (7) and positioned lower than the cross member (7).