Gap Generating Device for Sequential Container Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container treatment systems require complex and costly rejection processes, often involving wide conveyors and individual handling of containers, which are inefficient and lead to increased loss and operational complexity.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that includes a transport device creating gaps in the container stream before treatment, allowing for sequential rejection of containers using a pivoting rejection element, eliminating the need for individual handling and reducing loss by synchronizing treatment devices and using a single-track conveyor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a complex rejection system with a wide conveyor is used to reject containers individually, then the rejection capability is improved, but the device complexity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverejection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container stream is segmented into groups corresponding to the number of treatment elements. A gap is introduced in the container stream to allow sequential rejection of containers after treatment, eliminating the need for a complex wide conveyor system. The segmentation principle divides the continuous stream into manageable groups that can be processed and rejected in an organized manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A gap is generated in advance in the container stream before the treatment stage. This preliminary action of creating a gap allows the rejection mechanism to operate more simply, as containers can be rejected sequentially into the pre-created gap space rather than requiring complex simultaneous handling mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If individual container handling is performed, then the precision of rejection is improved, but the productivity and efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverejection precisionVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple container rejection operations are merged into a single sequential process. Instead of handling each container individually through complex mechanisms, the system combines the rejection of multiple containers into a streamlined sequential process that occurs after the gap is created and treatment is completed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The container stream maintains continuous flow through the treatment devices, with rejection occurring sequentially without interrupting the overall production flow. The gap generation and sequential rejection process ensures that the useful action of treating containers continues without significant interruption, maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Quantity of substance

If wide conveyors are used for rejection, then the rejection capacity is improved, but the loss of containers and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverejection capacityVSAvoidcontainer loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The rejection function is extracted from the complex wide conveyor system and simplified to a sequential rejection process. By removing the need for wide conveyors and complex handling mechanisms, the system reduces the risk of container loss during the rejection process while maintaining the capacity to reject the required quantity of containers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If treatment devices are synchronized with gap generation, then the operational efficiency is improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback from the gap generation device to coordinate the treatment devices and rejection mechanism. When a gap is generated in the container stream, the control system receives this information and synchronizes the treatment devices to process containers accordingly, ensuring efficient operation without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11492209B2Apparatus and method for discharging containers from container streams
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 KRONES AG
  • US11492209B2 patent drawing
  • US11492209B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for treating containers with a first treatment device configured to treat the containers in a predetermined first manner, with a transport device which transports the containers in a predetermined transport direction, wherein the transport device transports the containers in a transport stream extending in the transport direction, and with a reject device arranged after the first treatment device, which is configured to reject a plurality of containers arranged one after the other in the transport direction from the transport stream, wherein the apparatus has a second treatment device which is arranged before the first treatment device in the transport direction of the containers. The apparatus has a gap generating device which is arranged in front of the first treatment device in the transport direction of the containers and which generates at least one gap in the transport stream of the containers.