Garden Tool Activity Zone Coordination for Conflict Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing garden tools operate independently without considering the state of other activity areas or tools, leading to inefficiencies and potential conflicts, both between tools and with users.

Innovation Solution

A monitoring device that evaluates the state of activity areas and garden tools to control their operations, prioritizing activities, avoiding conflicts, and optimizing tool usage by considering the state of adjacent areas and user presence through a distributed system with processor and memory units, wireless communication, and integration with building automation systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If gardening tools operate independently without centralized coordination, then each tool can perform its function autonomously, but conflicts and inefficiencies arise between multiple tools and with users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operationVSAvoidconflict-free operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A monitoring device is introduced as an intermediary between multiple gardening tools and the central control system. This mediator collects status information from various tools, processes it according to priority rules, and coordinates their operations to prevent conflicts while maintaining autonomous functionality of individual tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If gardening tools operate without considering the status of other activity areas, then each tool can work independently, but inefficient resource use and conflicting activities occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool efficiencyVSAvoidresource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring device continuously collects status information from multiple activity areas and gardening tools, processes this feedback information according to defined priority rules, and adjusts tool operations dynamically. This feedback mechanism ensures that tools consider the current state of other areas before executing activities, optimizing resource allocation and preventing redundant operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a centralized monitoring system coordinates all gardening tool activities, then conflicts and inefficiencies are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordinated operationVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into independent modular components: individual gardening tools with their own control units, a monitoring device that collects and processes information, and a central control system that makes coordination decisions. This segmentation allows each component to remain relatively simple while achieving reliable coordinated operation through their interactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3785517B1System for controling the activity of at least one gardening device in at least one activity zone
Publication Date: 2024.08.28 HUSQVARNA AB
  • EP3785517B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3785517B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3785517B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a monitoring device for monitoring and controlling activities of at least one garden device (12) within at least one activity area (14), wherein the monitoring device, with the addition of the control, evaluates an activity state of at least one further activity area.