Cost Assessment User Interface for Garment Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designers in the apparel and home goods industries face challenges in assessing production costs during the design stage due to the lack of tools that can generate necessary cost information and the impracticality of gathering required data.

Innovation Solution

A cost assessment tool that uses a 3D digital model of a garment to parse properties and calculate production costs, including fabric, labor, shipping, and other costs, while providing an interactive interface for designers to edit designs and see cost implications in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If designers use traditional cost assessment methods (cost experts or manufacturer quotes), then cost assessment can be performed, but the process becomes manual, time-consuming, expensive, and slows down the design iteration process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost assessment accuracyVSAvoiddesign process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a 3D digital model (a copy or representation) of the garment to extract design parameters automatically, eliminating the need for manual cost assessment by experts or time-consuming manufacturer quotes. The 3D model contains all necessary geometric and material information that can be processed computationally to generate cost estimates instantly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of cost assessment (cost experts manually calculating costs or designers obtaining quotes from manufacturers) with an automated computational system that uses algorithms to process 3D model data and generate cost assessments automatically, significantly reducing time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If designers gather required cost data manually, then cost information can be obtained, but the process becomes impractical and time-consuming due to data being in different formats and locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost information availabilityVSAvoiddata gathering complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal cost assessment tool that can handle multiple data types and formats through a single integrated system. The tool can process various garment properties (fabric type, measurements, design features) from the 3D model and automatically retrieve corresponding cost data, eliminating the need for designers to manually gather and reconcile data from multiple sources in different formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a cost assessment tool as an intermediary system that bridges the gap between design information (3D model) and cost information. This intermediary automatically extracts parameters from the 3D model, retrieves relevant cost data, and presents integrated cost assessments to designers, simplifying the complex data gathering process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If cost assessment is performed at later stages (manufacturing or distribution), then cost viability can be determined, but money may already be spent on non-viable products and opportunities for cost reduction are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost viability determinationVSAvoidwasted production resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables cost assessment to be performed preliminarily during the design stage itself, before any manufacturing or distribution activities begin. By using the 3D digital model, the system can evaluate cost viability early, allowing designers to make cost-conscious decisions and avoid proceeding with non-viable designs, thus preventing waste of manufacturing resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If designers iterate on product design to improve design while minimizing cost, then design quality improves, but repeatedly employing cost experts slows the design process and adds complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign iteration capabilityVSAvoidcost assessment process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the 3D digital model as a reusable copy that can be rapidly modified during design iterations. Each iteration involves updating the 3D model with design changes, and the cost assessment tool automatically re-evaluates costs based on the updated model, enabling rapid iteration without repeatedly engaging cost experts and thus reducing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12314987B2Cost assessment user interface
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 TARGET BRANDS INC
  • US12314987B2 patent drawing
  • US12314987B2 patent drawing
  • US12314987B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cost assessment tool, method and system are disclosed. The cost assessment tool can parse a three-dimensional model to derive properties of a garment. The cost assessment tool can use the properties of the garment to assess the garment cost. The cost assessment tool can generate a user interface comprising the garment cost. In one example, the cost assessment tool can also use data related to garment production. In another example, the cost assessment tool can determine a fabric cost by using a representative size of a garment to determine a required fabric amount for a size range.