Gas Burner Ignition Control for Lean Hydrogen-Air Mixtures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heating boilers experience misfires during ignition, particularly when using hydrogen as fuel gas, due to the difficulty in maintaining a safe and lean fuel gas-air mixture with high flame speeds and short ignition delay times.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a control valve with an actuator and throttle element for closed-loop control of fuel gas flow, combined with a plausibility test and termination conditions to ensure a safe and lean ignition, including a differential pressure sensor to monitor pressure differences and an ignition sensor to detect flame formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If hydrogen is used as fuel gas to improve energy efficiency, then combustion efficiency is improved, but misfires occur during ignition due to high flame speeds and short ignition delay times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidignition reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control valve is moved to a reference position before ignition to pre-establish a safe minimum fuel gas flow rate. This preliminary action ensures that the fuel gas-air mixture is guaranteed to be lean enough to prevent misfires, addressing the reliability issue while maintaining hydrogen's combustion efficiency benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A plausibility test is performed to verify the control valve position and fuel gas flow rate before ignition. The differential pressure sensor provides feedback on the actual flow conditions, allowing the system to confirm the mixture is within safe lean limits before attempting ignition, thereby improving ignition reliability with hydrogen

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the fuel gas flow rate is increased to ensure ignitable mixture, then ignition reliability is improved, but the mixture may become too rich causing misfires

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition reliabilityVSAvoidmixture richness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control valve is positioned at a reference position that preemptively limits the fuel gas flow rate to a minimum safe level before ignition. This preliminary anti-action counteracts the tendency for the mixture to become too rich, preventing misfires while still ensuring ignitability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the flow rate parameter dynamically by moving the control valve to a reference position that establishes a minimum flow rate. This parameter adjustment ensures the mixture remains within the lean可燃 range, avoiding both misfires from rich mixtures and failure to ignite from lean mixtures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If a plausibility test is performed to verify control valve position, then safety is improved, but the ignition process time is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion safetyVSAvoidignition process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The plausibility test performs only the essential verification of control valve position and minimum flow rate conditions rather than a complete system check. This partial action provides sufficient safety verification for lean ignition while minimizing the time added to the ignition process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures reliable and safe ignition of the fuel gas-air mixture by preventing misfires and ensuring the mixture remains within safe combustion limits, even with fuels like hydrogen, by minimizing the risk of excessively rich mixtures.

Implementation Method 1

a differential pressure sensor (8) is provided, which is designed to acquire a pressure difference, referred to as offset pressure, between a measuring site (p2) along the fuel gas flow path and a measuring site (p1, p0) along the air flow path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential pressure measurement: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

An ignition device (7) is provided for igniting the fuel gas-air mixture on the gas burner (6)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS12523375B2Method for the failsafe and lean ignition of a gas-air mixture on a gas burner
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 EBM PAPST LANDSHUT GMBH
  • US12523375B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the failsafe and lean ignition of a fuel gas-air mixture on a gas burner (6), which is mixed in a mixing device (4) arranged upstream of the gas burner (6). A control valve (2) along the fuel gas flow path has an actuator (21) and a throttle element (23), moved by the actuator (21), for the closed-loop control of a flow rate of the fuel gas flowing into the mixing device (4). A test is performed to determine whether the throttle element (23) is in the throttle reference position when the actuator (21) is in the actuator reference position. The throttle element (23) is moved in a flow rate-increasing manner starting at a start time (tD). The flow rate-increasing movement of the throttle element (23) is stopped as soon as at least one of multiple predetermined termination conditions occurs.