Gas Cooktop Burner Re-Ignition Delay After Pan Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas cooktops with pot detection systems face challenges in safely re-igniting the gas burner when a pot is replaced, as the flame can briefly increase in size, potentially reaching pot handles, increasing the risk of burns due to the pressure conditions and ignition delay.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a time-delayed ignition system where the gas burner is only re-ignited at the originally set power level after a few seconds have passed since the pot is detected as being replaced, allowing users sufficient time to remove their hands, and optionally using visual and acoustic signals for added safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the gas burner is immediately re-ignited at the originally set power level when a pot is placed back on the hotplate, then the cooking process continues without interruption and productivity is maintained, but the flame size briefly increases and reaches the pot handles, creating a burn hazard

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking process continuityVSAvoidburn hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of the pot's presence before initiating full ignition. The pot detection system activates first, and only after confirming the pot is in place does the controller proceed to ignite the burner, ensuring the pot is positioned safely before the flame reaches full intensity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The ignition process is divided into periodic stages: first a preliminary detection phase where the system monitors pot presence, then an ignition phase where the burner is lit, and finally a full power phase where the originally set power level is reached. This staged approach prevents sudden flame increases by spacing out the activation steps in time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the gas burner is re-ignited with a time delay after pot detection, then the burn hazard is reduced by giving users time to remove their hands, but the cooking process is interrupted longer and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburn hazardVSAvoidcooking process continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The pot detection system performs preliminary detection and confirmation before initiating the ignition sequence. This preliminary phase ensures the pot is properly positioned and the user has had time to withdraw their hands, while the system prepares for imminent ignition, minimizing the perceived wait time for the user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors pot presence through the detection system and provides feedback to the control unit. When the pot is detected, the system confirms this status and uses this feedback to trigger the ignition sequence at the optimal moment, balancing safety delay with cooking continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Power

If the gas burner is re-ignited at full power level immediately, then the originally set power level is restored quickly and cooking efficiency is maintained, but the flame size increases briefly and creates a safety risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower level restoration speedVSAvoidflame reach to pot handles
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The power delivery is staged periodically: the burner is first ignited at a lower power level to establish a safe flame, then after a brief interval confirming pot presence, the power level is increased to the originally set level. This periodic power adjustment prevents sudden flame increases while maintaining efficient cooking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies a cushioning effect by initially igniting the burner at a reduced power level rather than full power. This creates a buffer zone where the flame is present but not intense enough to reach the pot handles, cushioning the transition from off-state to full-power operation and eliminating the harmful brief flame increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP2230462B1Method for controlling a cooking plate of a gas range
Publication Date: 2016.05.11 E G O ELEKTRO GERAETEBAU GMBH
  • EP2230462B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The method involves switching off a gas burner (16) and/or closing a corresponding gas valve (17) using a pan detection unit, when a pan (22) is detected initially at a cooking point (14) and detected as removed at the cooking point. The re-placing of pan onto the point is detected by the detection unit. The operation of the gas burner is renewed by igniting the gas burner after opening of gas valve. The gas burner is ignited after the pan is again placed on the cooking point, where power level originally set for the gas burner only takes place to a full extent with a delay. An independent claim is also included for a device for executing a method for operating a cooking point, comprising a gas burner.