Gas Cluster Ion Beam Surface Bioactivity Modification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for modifying surfaces to enhance bioactivity, such as for medical implants and laboratory wares, face challenges in effectively promoting cell attachment and proliferation, particularly due to issues like lack of vascularity and surface damage from conventional ion beams.

Innovation Solution

The use of gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) and neutral beam technologies to modify surfaces by increasing bioactivity through shallow penetration and controlled energy distribution, allowing for improved cell attachment and proliferation without deep surface damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional ion beam methods are used to modify surfaces, then surface bioactivity can be improved, but deep surface damage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface bioactivityVSAvoidsurface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ion beam is segmented into clusters of multiple atoms or molecules (e.g., argon clusters containing 10-1000 atoms) rather than using individual ions. This segmentation allows the total beam energy to be distributed across multiple particles, reducing the energy deposited at any single point and preventing deep surface damage while maintaining surface modification capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the beam by using gas cluster ion beams with specific cluster sizes (N=10 to N=1000 atoms) and controlling the beam energy (1-100 keV per cluster). These parameter changes enable shallow penetration depth (1-10 nm) compared to conventional ion beams, achieving surface bioactivity improvement without deep damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional ion beam irradiation is applied to insulating surfaces, then surface modification can occur, but charging effects cause additional damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface modificationVSAvoidcharging damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a neutralizing electron beam as an intermediary that accompanies the ion beam during surface processing. This electron beam neutralizes the positive charge accumulated on insulating surfaces, preventing charging-induced damage such as dielectric breakdown and material ejection, thereby enabling safe modification of insulating materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The harmful charging effect is extracted and counteracted by introducing electrons from an external source. The electron beam specifically targets and neutralizes the accumulated positive charge on the surface, separating the useful surface modification function from the harmful charging effect

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If high energy ion beams are used for surface processing, then processing speed increases, but surface damage and subsurface defects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsurface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the energy distribution parameters by using clustered ions with lower energy per atom (1-100 keV per cluster vs. higher energies for conventional beams) while maintaining high beam current. This parameter change enables fast processing speeds through high flux while limiting penetration depth and avoiding subsurface damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using multiple low-energy cluster ions rather than a single high-energy ion. The cumulative effect of many low-energy clusters achieves the desired surface modification depth and bioactivity improvement without the excessive energy deposition that causes deep damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

GCIB and neutral beam processing enhance surface bioactivity by promoting cell growth and attachment, reducing surface damage, and facilitating integration of medical implants and laboratory wares, while being suitable for sensitive materials like insulating surfaces.

Implementation Method 1

The use of gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) and neutral beam technologies to modify surfaces by increasing bioactivity through shallow penetration and controlled energy distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas cluster ion beam (GCIB): Ion Beam

Implementation Method 2

The use of gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) and neutral beam technologies to modify surfaces by increasing bioactivity through shallow penetration and controlled energy distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeutral beam:

Data Source

PatentUS9839723B2Methods for improving the bioactivity characteristics of a surface and objects with surfaces improved thereby
Publication Date: 2017.12.12 EXOGENESIS CORP
  • US9839723B2 patent drawing
  • US9839723B2 patent drawing
  • US9839723B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for improving bioactivity of a surface of an implantable object comprising titania, titanium, an alloy of titanium, and/or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and implantable objects prepared thereby provides forming an accelerated neutral beam derived from an accelerated gas-cluster ion-beam (GCIB) in a reduced-pressure chamber, introducing an implantable object into the reduced-pressure chamber, and irradiating at least a first portion of the surface of said implantable object with a GCIB-derived neutral beam.