Gas Cluster Ion Beam Surface Feature Normalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to modify surface features of workpieces to normalize properties, correct non-uniformities, or create intentional non-uniformities, which existing technologies cannot effectively achieve using gas cluster ion beams (GCIBs) for semiconductor processing applications.

Innovation Solution

A GCIB processing apparatus and method that uses a vacuum vessel with a source chamber, ionization/acceleration chamber, and processing chamber to form and direct ionized gas clusters, allowing for selective etching or deposition on workpieces to modify surface features, with a dosimetry processor controlling the beam dose and a scanning system for uniform processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional GCIB processing is used for etching or cleaning, then material removal or surface cleaning is achieved, but non-uniformities in surface features and critical dimensions cannot be corrected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of critical dimensionsVSAvoidability to normalize surface properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by delivering spatially varying doses of GCIB to different regions of the workpiece based on mapped non-uniformities. The system selectively targets specific areas with customized beam parameters to correct local deviations in critical dimensions, rather than applying uniform processing across the entire surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by first mapping the surface features and identifying non-uniformities before applying the corrective GCIB processing. This pre-characterization allows the system to plan and execute targeted corrections to normalize surface properties before final device fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If uniform GCIB dose is applied across the workpiece, then processing simplicity is maintained, but non-uniformities in surface features are not corrected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of surface featuresVSAvoidcomplexity of beam delivery system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the GCIB delivery system adjustable and controllable in real-time. The beam dose, scanning pattern, and processing parameters are dynamically modified based on the mapped surface characteristics, allowing the system to adapt to different non-uniformity patterns while maintaining a relatively simple base architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using measured surface feature data to guide and adjust the GCIB processing parameters. The system closes the loop by comparing actual surface characteristics against target specifications and modifying beam delivery accordingly to achieve the desired uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If GCIB is used for selective etching or deposition, then material modification is achieved, but precise control over feature uniformity is not obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol over critical dimensionsVSAvoidGCIB dose control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying GCIB processing parameters including dose, energy, scanning speed, and beam focus based on the specific non-uniformities detected. This allows precise control over material removal or deposition rates to correct critical dimension variations while maintaining overall process stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively normalizes and corrects non-uniformities in surface features, improving the uniformity of critical dimensions and electrical properties of semiconductor structures, enhancing device yields by precisely controlling the GCIB dose and pattern across the workpiece.

Implementation Method 1

The gas clusters can be ionized by electron bombardment, which permits the gas clusters to be formed into directed beams of controllable energy.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron bombardment ionization: Ionisation

Implementation Method 2

The gas clusters can be ionized by electron bombardment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 3

Gas-cluster ion beams (GCIB's) are used for etching, cleaning, smoothing, and forming thin films

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam acceleration: Ion Beam

Implementation Method 4

A GCIB processing apparatus and method that uses a vacuum vessel with a source chamber, ionization/acceleration chamber, and processing chamber to form and direct ionized gas clusters, allowing for selective etching or deposition on workpieces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam etching: Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS7626183B2Methods for modifying features of a workpiece using a gas cluster ion beam
Publication Date: 2009.12.01 美国泰尔制造与工程公司
  • US7626183B2 patent drawing
  • US7626183B2 patent drawing
  • US7626183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of methods of modifying surface features on a workpiece with a gas cluster ion beam are generally described herein. Other embodiments may be described and claimed.