Gas Compression Element Outlet Design for Overcompression Relief

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas compression elements experience dynamic overcompression and efficiency loss due to incomplete evacuation of compressed gas, leading to potential damage and increased power consumption.

Innovation Solution

The outlet opening in the gas compression element is redesigned with a tongue-shaped protrusion that intentionally allows controlled leakage to reduce overcompression, featuring smaller tongue edge radii and adjusted edge positions to enhance gas evacuation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the outlet opening is designed with a conventional sealing line-based shape, then the compression chamber is properly sealed from high-pressure gas, but dynamic overcompression occurs and compressed gas cannot be completely evacuated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoidgas evacuation completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The outlet opening is designed with non-uniform edge characteristics: the first tongue edge has a smaller radius than the sealing line trajectory radius, while the second tongue edge maintains or exceeds its corresponding sealing line radius. This local differentiation allows the first tongue edge to enable controlled leakage for complete gas evacuation, while the second tongue edge maintains proper sealing, thus resolving the contradiction between sealing effectiveness and gas evacuation completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the outlet opening follows the sealing line trajectory, then high-pressure gas is separated from low-pressure gas, but overcompression causes potential damage and increased power consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure separationVSAvoidovercompression damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention intentionally introduces a controlled defect by making the first tongue edge radius smaller than the sealing line trajectory radius. This creates a deliberate leakage path that converts the harmful effect of overcompression into a beneficial pressure-relief mechanism, allowing excess pressure to be released and preventing damage while maintaining effective pressure separation through the second tongue edge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If the outlet opening is positioned at the compression chamber outlet side, then compressed gas can be evacuated, but incomplete evacuation leads to efficiency loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas evacuation capabilityVSAvoidevacuation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the outlet opening edges, specifically setting the first tongue edge radius to be smaller than the sealing line trajectory radius. This parameter modification creates a pressure differential that drives complete gas evacuation from the compression chamber, eliminating the energy loss associated with incomplete evacuation while maintaining the outlet opening's strategic positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12460641B2Element, device and method for compressing a gas
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 ATLAS COPCO AIRPOWER NV
  • US12460641B2 patent drawing
  • US12460641B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An element for compressing a gas, having a housing (2) in which a first and second rotor (3, 4) are mounted, wherein the housing (2) is provided with an axial outlet opening (8) formed by: a tongue-shaped protrusion (14) between first and second proximal edge (9b), wherein an edge of the tongue-shaped protrusion (14) is formed by a first and second tongue edge (13a, 13b) that is further from the rotational axis of the first or second rotor (3, 4) than the second or first tongue edge (13a, 13b); and a first tongue edge radius of the first tongue edge (13a) relative to the first rotational axis is smaller than a parallel radius of a first geometric path relative to the first rotational axis, which path is a point of contact, situated furthest from the first rotational axis, between the end surfaces of a first and second lobe (5a, 5b).