Gas Detection Noise Compensation via Computational Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas detection devices face challenges in reliably monitoring spatial areas for combustible target gases due to interference from influencing variables like temperature, humidity, and sensor aging, which can lead to false alarms or missed detections.

Innovation Solution

A gas detection device and process that utilize a sensor unit with a detection variable sensor and a signal-processing influencing variable estimator to computationally compensate for the effects of slower and faster influencing variables, allowing for accurate detection of target gas concentrations by generating an influence-corrected detection variable.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a sensor is used to detect target gas concentration, then the detection capability is provided, but the detection variable is influenced by interfering variables (temperature, humidity, sensor aging) causing false alarms or missed detections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidinterference from influencing variables
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational model that acts as a mediator between the sensor measurements and the final detection decision. This model includes virtual sensors for influencing variables and a computational estimator that processes the relationship between sensor signals and environmental factors, thereby filtering out interference while preserving true gas concentration signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct physical compensation mechanisms with a computational/electronic system. Instead of using additional physical sensors or hardware components to physically compensate for environmental influences, the system uses software-based estimation and calculation to model and correct the effects of temperature, humidity, and sensor aging on the detection variable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If computational compensation for influencing variables is implemented, then detection precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection variable precisionVSAvoidsignal processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computational compensation system is self-service in nature, automatically estimating and correcting for influencing variables without requiring external intervention or manual calibration. The system uses its own sensor measurements and stored environmental data to dynamically adjust detection values, eliminating the need for complex external compensation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the detection system by introducing virtual sensor parameters for influencing variables and using these to compute corrected detection values. The system transforms raw sensor readings into compensated values by applying computational corrections based on estimated environmental parameter changes, thereby improving precision without proportionally increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230375516A1Gas detection device and gas detection process with automatic noise compensation
Publication Date: 2023.11.23 DRAGER SAFETY AG & CO KAAA
  • US20230375516A1 patent drawing
  • US20230375516A1 patent drawing
  • US20230375516A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device and process monitor a spatial area for a target gas. A sensor of the gas detection device used has a detection variable (ΔUkorr,0) that is affected by the concentration of target gas. A detection variable sensor measures this detection variable (ΔUkorr,0). The influence of a slower influencing variable and of a faster influencing variable, on the detection variable (ΔUkorr,0), are computationally compensated to determine an influence-corrected detection variable (ΔUkorr,1). Depending on the influence-corrected detection variable (ΔUkorr,1), the target gas concentration is determined. For computational compensation, the time course (Dr[ΔUkorr,0]) of the respective influence of the two influencing variables is estimated, for which a measurement value series from the detection variable sensor is used. The time course (Dr[ΔUkorr,0]) is determined in such a way that the change per time unit of the influence lies within a given change tolerance band (Dr′[ΔUkorr,0]min, Dr′[ΔUkorr,0]max) for this influencing variable.