Gas Detector Visual Compliance Verification via Self-Service Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual audits of gas detectors for compliance with safety standards are slow and expensive, requiring periodic bump tests and calibrations, necessitating a more efficient method to provide automatic compliance information without altering the detector's form factor or increasing costs.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a programmable processor with embedded control software in gas detectors to store and locally manage calibration and bump test data, using visual and audible indicators to show compliance only when both conditions are met, such as a green blinking LED for successful calibration and bump tests, allowing for automatic detection of non-compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual audits are conducted to check detector compliance, then compliance verification is achieved, but the process becomes slow and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance verificationVSAvoidaudit speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The detector performs self-verification of compliance by automatically executing bump tests and calibrations, then storing results in non-volatile memory. The system self-assesses whether it meets safety standards without requiring manual audit procedures, thereby eliminating the slow and expensive manual auditing process while maintaining reliable compliance verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The detector provides feedback to users about its compliance status through visual indicators (LED lights) and audible signals. The control circuit continuously monitors whether the detector is in compliance based on stored test results and communicates this status automatically, eliminating the need for manual audits and enabling rapid identification of non-compliant detectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If manual audits are conducted on a detector by detector basis, then compliance information is obtained, but the process becomes expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance informationVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The detector automatically performs compliance verification through embedded bump tests and calibrations, storing results in non-volatile memory. This self-service approach eliminates the need for expensive manual audits while ensuring complete and accurate compliance information is maintained for each detector individually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The detector creates a digital copy of its compliance status and test history in non-volatile memory. This electronic record serves as a permanent, accurate copy of compliance information that can be read by the control circuit and communicated to users, replacing the need for expensive manual auditing processes while maintaining complete information accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Extent of automation

If visual indicators are added to show compliance status, then automatic compliance detection is enabled, but the detector's form factor and weight may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance detectionVSAvoiddetector weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses color-changing LED indicators to communicate compliance status - green LED for compliant, red LED for non-compliant. This color-coding system provides immediate visual feedback about detector compliance without requiring complex displays or additional components, thereby achieving automation with minimal impact on form factor and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit acts as an intermediary between the detector's internal systems and the user. It processes compliance status information and translates it into simple visual and audible signals that users can easily understand, enabling automatic compliance detection without adding complex user interface components that would increase weight and alter form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid visual assessment of detector compliance, reducing the need for manual audits and enabling immediate replacement of non-compliant detectors, while maintaining ongoing gas sensing functionality without affecting the detector's form factor or weight.

Implementation Method 1

Other condition indicating visual devices, such as light emitting diodes (LEDs) can be coupled to the control circuits to provide detector status information apart from gas concentrations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight Emitting Diode: Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentUS11893871B2Gas detector with visual compliance verification
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11893871B2 patent drawing
  • US11893871B2 patent drawing
  • US11893871B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-sensor gas detector includes circuitry to evaluate if the detector is in compliance with predetermined safety requirements. Where the detector is in compliance, then a confidence indicator is intermittently activated at a predetermined frequency. Where the detector is out of compliance, the indicator is not activated providing indicia that the detector needs maintenance.