Gas Diffusion Electrode PTFE Layer Flooding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Gas Diffusion Electrodes (GDEs) face issues with unstable, inhomogeneous, and prone-to-flooding three-phase solid-liquid-gas boundaries due to non-uniform pore sizes and hydrophobicity, leading to inefficient electrochemical reactions and high operational costs, especially in industrial electrochemical processes.

Innovation Solution

The development of 3D electrodes with distinct regions for optimized pore structure and hydrophobicity, featuring a gas permeable material and a porous conductive material, which enhances the stability and definition of the three-phase boundary, allowing for higher wetting pressures and bubble points, thus preventing flooding and improving electrochemical activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional GDEs use graded particle sizes to create three-phase boundaries, then gas transmission and electrochemical activity are improved, but the boundaries become unstable, inhomogeneous, and prone to flooding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrochemical activityVSAvoidstability of three-phase boundary
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a porous PTFE layer with controlled pore structure to create a stable three-phase boundary. The porous structure allows gas permeation while the hydrophobic PTFE material prevents liquid water ingress, maintaining boundary stability. This resolves the contradiction by providing both the porosity needed for gas transmission and the structural integrity needed for boundary stability, eliminating the flooding issues associated with conventional graded particle size electrodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If GDEs use hydrophobic PTFE binder to control water ingress, then water penetration is limited, but the three-phase boundary becomes inhomogeneous and unpredictable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater ingress controlVSAvoiduniformity of three-phase boundary
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating distinct regions within the electrode structure. The porous PTFE layer is positioned specifically at the interface between the gas diffusion layer and electrolyte, concentrating the hydrophobic water-repelling function exactly where needed. This localized application of hydrophobic material ensures uniform three-phase boundary formation while maintaining effective water ingress control, resolving the inhomogeneity issue of conventional GDEs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The electrode is constructed as a composite structure combining conventional gas diffusion material with an integrated porous PTFE layer. This composite design merges the gas transmission capabilities of the GDE with the hydrophobic water barrier properties of PTFE, creating a unified structure that achieves both uniform three-phase boundary formation and controlled water ingress prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Speed

If pressure differential is increased to improve gas transmission, then gas flow rate increases, but flooding occurs due to liquid percolation through non-homogeneous pores

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas transmission rateVSAvoidflooding from liquid percolation
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The porous PTFE layer acts as an intermediary barrier between the gas diffusion layer and the electrolyte. It mediates the interaction between gas flow and liquid water by allowing gas to pass through while blocking liquid water, even under pressure differentials. This intermediary structure enables high gas transmission rates without causing flooding, as the PTFE layer prevents liquid percolation through the electrode structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The 3D electrode design achieves stable, well-defined three-phase boundaries with higher wetting pressures and electrochemical activity, reducing the risk of flooding and enhancing the efficiency of gas-to-liquid and liquid-to-gas electrochemical processes, making them more robust and cost-effective for industrial applications.

Implementation Method 1

The outer-most layers typically contain particles of the smallest dimensions, fused together with lesser amounts of hydrophobic PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene, or TeflonTM) binder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobicity: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 2

a gas permeable material and a porous conductive material, which enhances the stability and definition of the three-phase boundary

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPermeation: Permeation

Implementation Method 3

the smallest pore sizes are at the edges and the largest are in the centre. Since the pores are typically relatively hydrophobic (due to the PTFE binder), the small pore sizes at the edges (e.g. 30 microns pore size) act to hinder and limit the ingress of liquid water into the GDE

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary pressure: Capillary Pressure

Implementation Method 4

hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells typically utilize the transformation of gaseous oxygen and hydrogen into liquid water at solid-phase, electrically-connected catalysts, like platinum metal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reaction: Electrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS11018345B2Method and electrochemical cell for managing electrochemical reactions
Publication Date: 2021.05.25 HYSATA PTY LTD
  • US11018345B2 patent drawing
  • US11018345B2 patent drawing
  • US11018345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and/or electrochemical cell for utilising one or more gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) in an electrochemical cell, the one or more gas diffusion electrodes have a wetting pressure and/or a bubble point exceeding 0.2 bar. The one or more gas diffusion electrodes can be subjected to a pressure differential between a liquid side and a gas side. A pressure on the liquid side of the GDE over the gas side does not exceed the wetting pressure of the GDE during operation (in cases where a liquid electrolyte side has higher pressure), and/or a pressure on the gas side of the GDE over the liquid side, does not exceeds the bubble point of the GDE (in cases where the gas side has the higher pressure).