Gas Safety Electrovalve Control With Triple Switching Redundancy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety solenoid valves for gas appliances are prone to erroneous operation due to malfunctions in control systems, which can jeopardize the safety of the appliance and users, as they may incorrectly open or fail to close during malfunctions.

Innovation Solution

A safety device with a series arrangement of three switching means and separate control signals, where the positioning of these means is controlled by distinct signals, including a dynamic-type signal anomaly detection mechanism to ensure the solenoid valve remains closed in case of malfunctions, providing redundancy and reducing the likelihood of erroneous operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single switching means is used to control the solenoid valve, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of safety control deteriorates due to potential malfunctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of safety controlVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into three independent switching means (I1, I2, I3) that operate in parallel, each capable of independently controlling the solenoid valve. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliability even if one switching means fails, as the other two can still perform the safety function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by providing redundant switching means and control means before any malfunction can occur. The third switching means and third control means serve as a backup that activates when anomalies are detected in the first two control paths, ensuring continuous safe operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If redundant switching means are added to improve safety, then the reliability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of gas applianceVSAvoidnumber of switching means
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its complexity by using three switching means instead of a fixed single or dual configuration. The dynamic-type signal processing allows the system to adapt its control strategy based on real-time conditions, optimizing the balance between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of switching means from a single unit to three units, and changes the control signal type from static to dynamic. This parameter change enables the system to detect anomalies through signal analysis while maintaining a manageable level of complexity through standardized switching components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If static control signals are used, then the ease of operation is high, but the ability to detect malfunctions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection capabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of control signal processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic dynamic-type signals instead of continuous static signals. By analyzing the temporal characteristics and periodicity of these signals, the system can detect malfunctions through changes in signal patterns, providing anomaly detection capability while maintaining relatively simple processing logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The processing means analyze the dynamic-type control signals and provide feedback when anomalies are detected. This feedback mechanism enables automatic malfunction detection without requiring complex continuous monitoring, as the system only needs to respond when signal characteristics deviate from expected patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures the solenoid valve is reliably controlled, even with malfunctions in two of the control systems, adhering to safety standards by minimizing the risk of incorrect opening or closure, thus enhancing user and appliance safety.

Implementation Method 1

safety solenoid valve adapted to allow passage (solenoid valve open) or to cut off the passage (solenoid valve closed) of a flow of gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentEP2221544B1Safety device for a gas appliance with a safety electro-valve
Publication Date: 2015.08.12 GRP BRANDT
  • EP2221544B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2221544B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The device (10) has a first transistor (I1) for controlling opening and closing of a safety electrovalve (1) respectively when the transistor is in closed and open states, and positioned based on a first control signal (A). Second and third transistors (I2, I3) in series with the first transistor control opening of the valve when the second and third transistors are in the closed state and closing of the valve when the second and third transistors are in the open state. The second and third transistors are respectively positioned based on second and third control signals (B, C). The transistors can be NPN or PNP transistors.