Gas Emission Detection Using Sensor Grid and Plume Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting gas leaks in industrial gas production and distribution environments are inefficient, as they struggle to accurately determine emission rates and source locations due to prevailing weather conditions and the lack of commercially available systems that can pinpoint leaks from specific equipment under varying wind conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing Near-Field and Far-Field sensors deployed in a grid-like arrangement to collect and communicate data, including wind and gas concentration data, which uses a plume advection-diffusion model to determine emission rates and generate emission data, thereby automating the detection of gas leaks and improving maintenance operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional gas leak detection methods are used, then operational safety can be maintained to some extent, but measurement precision of emission rates and source locations deteriorates under varying weather conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission rate and source location detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem performance under varying wind conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the detection area into multiple zones with strategically positioned sensors (upstream, downstream, crosswind locations) to capture gas plume characteristics from different angles. This segmentation enables accurate source location determination and emission rate calculation even when wind conditions change, as multiple sensor readings provide redundant measurement paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors and adapts to changing weather parameters (wind speed, wind direction, temperature) by adjusting detection algorithms and sensor activation patterns. This parameter adaptation allows the system to maintain measurement precision across varying environmental conditions by compensating for plume dispersion changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If manual inspection methods are used, then equipment complexity is reduced, but productivity of gas leak detection and response time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas leak detection speed and response timeVSAvoidsensor network and data processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-monitoring and automated detection of gas leaks without requiring continuous manual inspection. Sensors automatically detect gas concentrations, the system autonomously processes data to determine source locations and emission rates, and generates alerts without human intervention, thereby significantly improving detection productivity and response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical inspection methods with automated electronic sensor networks and computational analysis. This substitution eliminates the need for personnel to physically inspect equipment, enabling continuous monitoring and rapid detection of gas leaks, thus improving productivity while the automated system handles the complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor deployment is implemented, then measurement precision of gas emissions is improved, but loss of time for data processing and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas concentration and source location accuracyVSAvoiddata processing and emission rate calculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores dispersion model parameters and processing algorithms before actual gas leak detection occurs. When gas emissions are detected, the pre-prepared computational frameworks enable rapid processing of sensor data to determine source locations and emission rates, minimizing data processing time while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides accurate emission rate and source location data, enhancing operational safety and production efficiency by automating the detection of gas leaks and improving maintenance planning in gas production and distribution environments.

Implementation Method 1

plume advection-diffusion model to determine emission rates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdvection: Advection

Implementation Method 2

plume advection-diffusion model to determine emission rates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS11649782B2Gas emission monitoring and detection
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11649782B2 patent drawing
  • US11649782B2 patent drawing
  • US11649782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and a computer readable medium are provided for monitoring and detecting a gas emission. Sensor data including gas concentration and wind data associated with a gas emission from an emission source is received from Near-Field and Far-Field sensors configured within a gas production and distribution environment. The sensor data can be provided as inputs to a Near-Field dispersion model to determine an emission rate associated with the gas emission and one or more source locations associated with the gas emission. The emission rate can be included in emission data and provided for output. Related apparatus, systems, techniques, and articles are also described.