Gas-Burning Fire Igniter Control With Proof-of-Flame Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gas-burning fire installations, particularly outdoor fireplaces, face challenges in initiating, controlling, and managing flames under adverse environmental conditions such as cold temperatures, rain, and wind, with igniters being difficult to adequately control.

Innovation Solution

A gas-burning fire installation with an igniter control system that includes a control unit operatively coupled to a control valve, sensor, and igniter, which operates in ignition and run modes to manage fuel gas flow, igniter activation, and Proof of Flame (POF) detection, retrying ignition attempts if POF is not achieved, and terminating operations if unsuccessful.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional igniters are used in outdoor gas-burning fireplaces, then ignition function is provided, but reliable control under adverse environmental conditions (cold temperatures, rain, wind) is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveigniter control reliabilityVSAvoidenvironmental conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors flame presence through the sensor and adjusts igniter operation accordingly. When flame is detected, the system knows to stop igniter operation; when flame is lost, the system automatically reignites. This closed-loop feedback ensures reliable operation regardless of environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects flame status and manages its own ignition operations without manual intervention. The control unit monitors the sensor continuously and self-adjusts igniter and valve operations, making the system self-sufficient in handling environmental variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the control system continuously monitors and retries ignition, then flame control reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame control reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor provides continuous feedback to the control unit about flame presence. This simple feedback mechanism enables automatic monitoring and retry operations without requiring complex control logic, maintaining system simplicity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs periodic checks of flame status through the sensor and executes retry ignition at predetermined intervals when flame loss is detected. This structured periodic operation simplifies control logic compared to continuous complex monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If the igniter is allowed to heat up for an extended period, then ignition success rate improves, but energy consumption and operation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition success rateVSAvoidigniter heating period
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit monitors the sensor during the igniter heating period to detect when flame has been successfully established. This feedback allows the system to terminate heating as soon as ignition succeeds, optimizing the heating duration based on actual ignition conditions rather than using a fixed extended period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The igniter heating period is dynamically adjusted based on sensor feedback rather than being a fixed static duration. The system extends heating only as long as necessary to achieve ignition, adapting to varying environmental conditions and fuel states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances flame control and reliability in challenging environments by ensuring consistent ignition and flame maintenance through adaptive control strategies, reducing the need for manual intervention.

Implementation Method 1

the control unit is configured to turn on power to the control valve, the sensor, and the igniter, so as to allow the igniter to heat up for an igniter heating period

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

allows the igniter to ignite the flow of fuel gas at or adjacent to the burner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

The control unit checks for Proof of Flame (POF) gain based on data from the sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame detection:

Data Source

PatentUS12455077B2Gas-burning fire installation with an igniter control system
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 TRAVIS IND INC
  • US12455077B2 patent drawing
  • US12455077B2 patent drawing
  • US12455077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to gas-burning fire installations, such as gas-burning fireplace assemblies, fire table assemblies, gas lamps, gas torches, lanterns, other gas-burning lighting features, heated fountains, etc., that have fuel igniters and igniter control systems. Some embodiments provide a gas-burning fire installation that has a control unit configured to operate in an ignition mode or a run mode, and check for Proof of Flame (POF) gain or loss based on temperature readings by a sensor coupled to a burner and the control unit.