Gas Fuel Delivery Pressure Control for Hydrocarbon Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gas turbine fuel systems require multiple heat exchangers and additional capital costs to maintain fuel temperature above the hydrocarbon dew point during startup operations, leading to inefficiencies and increased power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a pressure changing device and a separator, controlled by sensing devices and a controller to determine and achieve a desired pressure for removing liquids from the fuel, reducing the need for multiple heat exchangers and optimizing fuel supply to the gas turbine.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If multiple heat exchangers are used to maintain fuel temperature above dew point during startup, then fuel temperature control is improved, but device complexity and capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel temperatureVSAvoidnumber of heat exchangers
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the control parameter from temperature-based control (using multiple heat exchangers to maintain temperature above dew point) to pressure-based control (using a single pressure changing device to reduce pressure to an optimal value). This parameter transformation simplifies the system while maintaining the goal of preventing condensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and eliminates the need for multiple heat exchangers by introducing a single pressure changing device that performs the essential function of preventing condensation through pressure reduction. This extraction removes unnecessary components while preserving the core function of fuel temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Temperature

If multiple heat exchangers with independent heat sources are used during startup, then fuel temperature control is improved, but power consumption and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel temperatureVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the control approach from thermal energy addition (using multiple heat exchangers consuming power) to pressure reduction (using a single pressure changing device). This parameter change eliminates the need for continuous power consumption while achieving the same temperature control objective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and removes the power-consuming heat exchanger components during startup operations, replacing them with a pressure changing device that achieves temperature control without requiring additional power input, thereby reducing operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If conventional fuel systems use heat exchangers to prevent condensation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of condensationVSAvoidnumber of heat exchangers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the control parameter from temperature maintenance (requiring multiple heat exchangers) to pressure reduction (using a single pressure changing device). This parameter transformation maintains reliability in preventing condensation while significantly reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and eliminates unnecessary heat exchanger components by introducing a single pressure changing device that achieves the same reliability goal of preventing condensation through an alternative mechanism, thereby simplifying the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces hardware costs, improves plant efficiency by minimizing the number of heating devices, and prevents damage to turbine components from liquids and condensates, while maintaining fuel temperature above the dew point.

Implementation Method 1

As the fuel expands through the flow control valve 18, the Joule-Thomson effect causes a decrease in the temperature of the fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule-Thomson effect: Joule-Thomson Effect

Implementation Method 2

the separator 16 removes any condensed fluids (e.g., water, condensed hydrocarbons, etc.) from the fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS8850818B2Systems and methods for gas fuel delivery with hydrocarbon removal utilizing active pressure control and dew point analysis
Publication Date: 2014.10.07 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US8850818B2 patent drawing
  • US8850818B2 patent drawing
  • US8850818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for supplying fuel to a gas turbine are described. A fuel may be received, and one or more parameters associated with the received fuel may be determined. Based at least in part upon the determined one or more parameters, a desired pressure for removing one or more liquids from the fuel utilizing a separator may be calculated. The operation of a pressure changing device may then be controlled in order to achieve the desired pressure. In certain embodiments, the operations of the method may be performed by a controller that includes one or more computers.