Gas Injection Timing Control for Premature Combustion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining fuel injection timing in internal combustion engines are insufficient for gaseous fuels and fuel mixtures, as they do not account for longer injection durations and other critical parameters such as physical dimensions of the engine, leading to inefficient fuel injection.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines the start, end, and duration of gas injection in an internal combustion engine based on various operating parameters, ensuring the start of injection does not occur before the earliest possible start, thereby optimizing fuel injection for gaseous fuels by adjusting parameters like engine load and valve timing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If injection timing is calculated based on engine revolution rate and load, then injection timing can be determined for liquid fuels, but the method is insufficient for gaseous fuels requiring longer injection duration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel type adaptabilityVSAvoidinjection timing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the calculation parameters from simple engine revolution rate and load to a comprehensive set including intake manifold pressure, temperature, density, and speed of sound. This allows the same injection timing calculation method to accurately accommodate both liquid and gaseous fuels with different physical properties, resolving the adaptability issue while maintaining reliability through physics-based calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If standard injection timing calculation is used, then calculation simplicity is maintained, but other critical parameters such as physical dimensions of engine components are not accounted for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation complexityVSAvoidinjection timing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with a computational approach using the speed of sound in the intake charge. By calculating the time for the sound wave to travel from the injector to the intake valve and back, the system accurately determines injection timing without requiring complex physical dimension measurements, thus maintaining calculation simplicity while achieving high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If injection timing does not account for gaseous fuel characteristics, then standard control routines can be used, but premature injection occurs leading to hydrocarbon release

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol routine simplicityVSAvoidhydrocarbon release
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism using intake manifold pressure and temperature sensors to continuously monitor the state of the intake charge. This feedback allows the control system to dynamically adjust injection timing based on actual conditions, preventing premature injection and hydrocarbon release while maintaining operationally simple control routines through automated real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9512803B2Injection timing
Publication Date: 2016.12.06 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9512803B2 patent drawing
  • US9512803B2 patent drawing
  • US9512803B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various systems and methods for determining a start of fuel injection including a gaseous fuel in an internal combustion engine are provided. In one embodiment, an end of gas injection, a duration of gas injection, and a start of gas injection in an induction pipe of a cylinder of an internal combustion engine is determined based on one or more operating parameters. An earliest possible start of gas injection is further determined, and if the start of gas injection is before the earliest possible start of gas injection, at least one of the one or more operating parameters is modified such that the start of gas injection does not occur before the earliest possible start of gas injection.