Gas Leak Detection via Wind-Compensated Vehicle Surveys

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for detecting gas leaks in pipelines are time-consuming and unreliable, especially due to wind dispersion, which complicates locating the source of leaks during survey runs.

Innovation Solution

A system and method involving a sequence of gas leak detection survey runs using moving vehicles equipped with gas concentration measurement devices and processors to generate emission rate indicators, allowing for geospatially-referenced location analysis and comparison of emission rate changes to determine the source of leaks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a gas leak detection instrument is mounted on a moving vehicle to cover more ground, then the survey speed and area coverage are improved, but the ability to locate the gas leak source accurately deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvey speedVSAvoidleak source location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The survey path is divided into multiple discrete measurement points along the vehicle trajectory. Gas concentration measurements are taken at each segment point, and the data from these segmented measurements are processed to identify the leak source location, enabling accurate localization while maintaining vehicle-speed survey capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time feedback by continuously processing gas concentration measurements and generating leak probability indicators during the vehicle survey. This feedback mechanism allows operators to immediately identify areas of concern and adjust the survey focus, maintaining both speed and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If engineers walk slowly and scan the area in all directions to locate the gas leak source, then the leak source detection accuracy is improved, but the time required for detection increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak source detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scanning at vehicle speed to identify potential leak areas before focusing detailed detection efforts. By pre-identifying regions with abnormal gas concentrations during the fast vehicle survey, the system eliminates the need for comprehensive slow scanning in all directions, significantly reducing total detection time while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The survey approach transitions from static slow scanning to dynamic vehicle-based measurement. The system adapts the detection strategy by processing measurements taken during vehicle motion, using algorithms that can accurately determine leak sources from dynamic, moving-platform data rather than requiring stationary slow scanning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If gas concentration measurements are taken during vehicle movement, then the survey efficiency is improved, but the measurement reliability deteriorates due to wind dispersion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvey efficiencyVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces wind speed and wind direction measurements as intermediary parameters to mediate between the vehicle motion and gas concentration readings. By incorporating meteorological data into the analysis, the system compensates for wind dispersion effects, allowing reliable leak source identification from measurements taken during vehicle movement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the analytical parameters by considering not only gas concentration but also wind speed, wind direction, and vehicle position. This multi-parameter approach transforms the raw concentration measurements into reliable leak source identification by accounting for environmental factors that affect gas plume dispersion during vehicle-based surveys

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient and reliable localization of gas leaks by accounting for wind dispersion and providing real-time indicators for operators, significantly improving the accuracy and speed of leak detection.

Implementation Method 1

The apparatus is arranged such that natural gas intercepts a beam path and absorbs representative wavelengths of a light beam. A receiver section receives a portion of the light beam onto an electro-optical etalon for detecting the gas.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption Spectroscopy: Absorption Spectroscopy

Data Source

PatentUS10386258B1Systems and methods for detecting changes in emission rates of gas leaks in ensembles
Publication Date: 2019.08.20 PICARRO INC
  • US10386258B1 patent drawing
  • US10386258B1 patent drawing
  • US10386258B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, computer-implemented systems/methods detect and/or quantify changes in emission rates of gas emission sources (e.g. natural gas leaks originating from underground distribution pipelines) using data from multiple vehicle-based measurement runs. Exemplary described methods aim to address the observation that large (e.g. 10×) changes in gas concentrations away from a source may be observed even in the absence of significant changes in source emission rate, due to changes in wind or other atmospheric conditions and local spatial variations in gas concentrations. Described methods are useful for identifying large increases in the emission rate(s) of known sources, for example due to frost heave or other dislocations. Multiple runs are performed along the same survey path in closely-related conditions (e.g. same time of day, same lanes), and a statistical test (e.g. a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) is used to identify changes in concentration reflecting changes in emission rates.