Gas Lock Turbulent Flow Sealing for Coating Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gas separation methods in continuous coating systems face challenges such as gas mixing, safety risks from toxic and explosive gases, inability to detect leaks without pressure measurement, spatial inefficiency, wear and tear, and low system uptime due to mechanical contact and non-directional gas showers.

Innovation Solution

A gas lock design with an inflow body, a wall forming a gap, and means to generate turbulent flow within the gap, preventing backflow and ensuring efficient separation of gas chambers without mechanical contact, allowing for continuous operation and safety control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional sealing concepts with mechanical seals are used to separate gas chambers, then gas separation reliability is improved, but mechanical wear and tear occurs and continuous operation is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas separation reliabilityVSAvoidsystem uptime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical sealing systems with a gas dynamic sealing concept. A controlled gas flow through a narrow gap creates a pressure distribution that prevents gas mixing without mechanical contact. The gas flow acts as a seal, eliminating wear and enabling continuous operation while maintaining separation reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses pneumatic principles by introducing a sealing gas flow through a controlled gap between the inflow body and wall. The gas flow creates a hydrodynamic barrier that prevents mixing of process gases, replacing mechanical seals with a fluid-based sealing mechanism that operates continuously without wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Duration of action of stationary object

If gas showers are used for gas separation, then continuous operation is maintained, but the separation is non-directional and insufficient for high-purity processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidgas separation purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a localized controlled flow environment in the narrow gap between the inflow body and wall. The gas flow is directed specifically through this confined space, creating a unidirectional seal that provides both continuous operation and high-purity separation. The local flow control eliminates the non-directional nature of conventional gas showers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If mechanical seals are used to separate gas chambers, then gas mixing is prevented, but spatial complexity increases and cost rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas mixing preventionVSAvoidspatial complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a thin gap between the inflow body and wall as the sealing element, replacing bulky mechanical seal assemblies. This narrow space, through which controlled gas flow passes, provides effective separation with minimal spatial requirements and reduced system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If pressure measurement is used to detect sealing failures, then leak detection capability is improved, but system complexity and cost increase due to explosion-proof requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection capabilityVSAvoidexplosion-proof device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a sealing gas as an intermediary substance that flows through the gap and prevents process gas leakage. By monitoring the flow characteristics or composition of this intermediary gas, sealing effectiveness can be detected without directly measuring pressure in potentially explosive process gases, avoiding explosion-proof requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The gas lock effectively separates gas chambers, minimizing spatial complexity, ensuring continuous system operation, safety, and reducing costs by preventing gas mixing and leaks, while maintaining high-purity processes.

Implementation Method 1

means to generate turbulent flow within the gap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentEP2633097B1Gas lock, and coating apparatus comprising a gas lock
Publication Date: 2018.04.25 FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV
  • EP2633097B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2633097B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2633097B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a gas lock for separating two gas chambers, said gas lock allowing gases to be separated using minimal space and without contacting the product/feedstock/transport system. The gas lock of the invention is characterized in that at least one flow manipulation means is provided in a duct of the gas lock. The invention also relates to a coating apparatus comprising a gas lock of the invention. Furthermore, possible uses of the disclosed gas lock are indicated.