Gas Preheating for Double-Sided Epitaxial Deposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional epitaxial deposition equipment for solar substrate manufacturing is inefficient in terms of energy usage, capital expense, and process gas utilization, limiting throughput and suitability for producing high-efficiency solar cells due to sub-optimal heating methods and large processing volumes.

Innovation Solution

A substrate processing system with a multi-zone resistive heater assembly and gas preheating, allowing for double-sided epitaxial deposition with improved gas utilization and energy efficiency, using a chamber with silicon carbide-coated graphite parts and preheating carrier gases before mixing with processing gases for uniform substrate heating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by stationary object

If conventional lamp-heated crossflow epitaxial deposition equipment is used, then substrates can be heated for deposition, but energy efficiency is less than twenty-percent and operating costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidoperating cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical lamp-heating system with a gas-phase heating system where hot carrier gas directly contacts the substrates. This substitution eliminates the need for infrared lamps and susceptors, achieving near 100% energy efficiency by delivering thermal energy through the processing gas itself rather than through radiative heating with significant thermal losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier gas serves as an intermediary that transports thermal energy from the heating zone to the substrates. By preheating the carrier gas to deposition temperature and using it to directly contact the substrates, the system achieves efficient heat transfer without the thermal losses associated with lamp-based radiative heating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If single substrate systems are used, then deposition can be performed, but throughput is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsubstrate capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple substrate processing capabilities into a single reaction chamber by stacking multiple substrates vertically on susceptors. The system can simultaneously process multiple substrates in a single batch, with the ability to perform double-sided deposition by alternating gas flow directions, thereby multiplying throughput without proportionally increasing chamber volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from processing substrates in a single layer to stacking substrates vertically in multiple layers within the reaction chamber. This three-dimensional substrate arrangement dramatically increases the number of substrates that can be processed simultaneously, converting a two-dimensional single-substrate layout into a three-dimensional multi-substrate configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional susceptor heating methods are used, then substrates can be heated, but the approach is capital intensive and requires complex electromechanical components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment costVSAvoidheating system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the heating function from the susceptor and relocates it to the carrier gas phase. By removing the need for susceptor-based resistive or inductive heating systems, the invention eliminates complex electromechanical heating components, power supplies, and associated control systems, resulting in a simpler, more cost-effective system that uses gas-phase heating instead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier gas serves dual functions: it transports the silicon precursor for deposition and simultaneously provides the thermal energy for heating substrates to deposition temperature. This self-service approach eliminates the need for separate heating systems, as the processing gas itself performs the heating function through its thermal energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of substance

If large processing volumes are used, then multiple substrates can be accommodated, but process gas utilization is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess gas utilizationVSAvoidprocessing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous gas recirculation where the carrier gas flows through the reaction chamber, deposits silicon on substrates, and is then recirculated back through the heating zone to be reheated and reused. This continuous circulation maximizes the utilization of the process gas and silicon precursor, reducing waste and improving deposition efficiency compared to single-pass gas systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves high energy efficiency, low capital expenditure, and high throughput by enabling simultaneous double-sided processing, reducing parasitic deposits and maintenance needs, while optimizing gas utilization and substrate temperature control.

Implementation Method 1

a first gas heater coupled via a first conduit to the first carrier gas inlet to heat the carrier gas prior to entering the inner processing volume

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistive heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

a heater assembly disposed within the chamber body, wherein the heater assembly includes a plurality of resistive heater elements coupled together to form a heated enclosure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistive heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 3

a silicon carbide (SiC) coating disposed on the surfaces of the graphite base protects the graphite from oxidation and chemical degradation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation resistance: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS9982364B2Process gas preheating systems and methods for double-sided multi-substrate batch processing
Publication Date: 2018.05.29 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US9982364B2 patent drawing
  • US9982364B2 patent drawing
  • US9982364B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, an substrate processing system may include a chamber body, a heater assembly disposed within the chamber body, wherein the heater assembly includes a plurality of resistive heater elements coupled together to form an isothermal heated enclosure, and a process kit disposed within the isothermal heated enclosure and having an inner processing volume that includes a plurality of substrate supports to support substrates when disposed thereon, wherein the process kit includes a first processing gas inlet to provide processing gases to the inner processing volume, a first carrier gas inlet to provide a carrier gas to the inner processing volume, and a first exhaust outlet, and a first gas heater coupled via a first conduit to the first carrier gas inlet to heat the carrier gas prior to flowing into the inner processing volume.