Gas Pressure Reducer Lever Shut-Off for Under-Pressure Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pressure reducers lack an effective and cost-efficient mechanism to safely shut off gas flow in case of under-pressure conditions, such as impurities sealing the gas intake or leaks downstream, which can lead to safety hazards and require intervention to restore proper operation.

Innovation Solution

A pressure reducer design featuring a flexible diaphragm, a two-part regulation lever with a stop mechanism, and elastic means to bias the diaphragm towards a minimum volume, ensuring the gas intake is sealed when pressure drops, along with a visible safety indicator to alert users of the safety configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional pressure reducer design is used, then the structure is simple and cost-effective, but it lacks an effective under-pressure safety shut-off mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety shut-off functionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the safety shut-off function with the existing pressure regulation mechanism by integrating a stop mechanism into the body that interacts with the regulation lever. This merging approach allows the safety function to be added without requiring a separate independent system, thus improving reliability while minimizing the increase in device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety mechanism operates automatically based on pressure conditions without requiring external control or additional power sources. The elastic means (spring) and stop mechanism work together to automatically shut off gas flow when under-pressure conditions are detected, allowing the system to serve its safety function autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a safety shut-off mechanism is added to the pressure reducer, then under-pressure safety is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunder-pressure safetyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The safety mechanism is integrated with existing components rather than being implemented as a separate assembly. The stop is formed as part of the body structure, and the regulation lever serves dual purposes (pressure regulation and safety shut-off), which reduces the number of additional parts needed and lowers manufacturing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety mechanism uses simple, inexpensive components such as a spring (elastic means) and a stop feature that can be easily manufactured. These components are designed to be cost-effective while providing reliable safety functionality, avoiding the use of expensive materials or complex mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If the lever seals the gas intake in the second closure position, then safety shut-off is achieved, but the chamber volume reduces to minimum

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety shut-offVSAvoidchamber volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The regulation lever is designed to pivot between multiple positions (first closure position, maximum opening position, and second closure position) based on pressure conditions. This dynamic capability allows the lever to automatically transition to the second closure position when under-pressure is detected, sealing the gas intake and reducing chamber volume to minimum as a safety measure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for a simple, low-cost implementation of an under-pressure safety system that effectively shuts off gas flow in case of anomalies, ensuring user safety and easy identification of issues without significant modifications to existing pressure reducers.

Implementation Method 1

elastic means (i.e., a resilient member), such as for example, a spring, for biasing the diaphragm towards the position defining a minimum volume of the chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a gas intake flow rate regulation lever cooperating with the finger and pivotally mounted in the chamber between: a first closure position corresponding to a maximum volume of the chamber, in which the lever seals the gas intake

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical sealing: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS11187340B2Gas pressure reducer
Publication Date: 2021.11.30 CLESSE IND
  • US11187340B2 patent drawing
  • US11187340B2 patent drawing
  • US11187340B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas pressure reducer with a safety function in the case of under-pressure includes a lever having a first portion pivotally mounted on a body about a first axis and adapted to seal the gas intake, and a second portion pivotally mounted on the first portion about a second axis and cooperating with a finger secured to a flexible diaphragm.