Gas Regulator Integrated Overpressure Safety Shutter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gas pressure regulators for domestic appliances, such as those using liquefied petroleum gas, often fail to regulate pressure effectively due to fouling, leading to excessive gas pressure that can cause equipment deterioration, poor combustion, and gas leaks, necessitating additional safety systems like Over Pressure Shut-Off (OPSO) which complicate installations and increase bulk.

Innovation Solution

A regulator with integrated overpressure safety features, including a movable shutter axis, elastic return mechanism, locking means, and a visible reset button, allows for automatic shut-off when pressure exceeds a threshold, indicating the status externally and preventing gas flow without the need for additional devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an additional independent OPSO system is coupled to the regulator, then overpressure safety is improved, but installation complexity and device bulk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverpressure safetyVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The OPSO system is merged with the regulator body into an integrated unit. The shutter axis, locking means, and indicating means are incorporated within the regulator structure, eliminating the need for separate coupling of an independent OPSO system during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The regulator body serves multiple functions: pressure reduction, overpressure detection, gas flow shut-off, and status indication. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated OPSO equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If an additional independent OPSO system is coupled to the regulator, then overpressure safety is improved, but device bulk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverpressure safetyVSAvoiddevice bulk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The OPSO components (shutter axis, locking means, indicating means) are merged into the regulator body, utilizing existing structural space and eliminating the need for separate dedicated OPSO equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If the reset button is positioned on the gas inlet or outlet side, then resetting is simplified, but gas leakage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresetting easeVSAvoidgas leakage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reset button is extracted from the gas inlet/outlet piping zones and repositioned on the regulator body in a location clear of any gas inlet or outlet pipe, eliminating the gas leakage risk while maintaining operational accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Device complexity

If the shutter axis is locked in open position without indicating means, then device simplicity is maintained, but safety monitoring capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidsafety status information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The indicating means uses color changes (transparent to opaque) of a visible portion to communicate the locked/unlocked status of the shutter axis, providing clear safety status information through optical property changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The indicating means provides visual feedback about the shutter axis status. When the shutter axis is locked in the closed position, the indicating means changes appearance to inform users of the safety activation state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a compact, reliable, and user-friendly overpressure safety system that prevents excessive gas pressure issues, ensuring safe operation and reducing installation complexity by integrating safety functions within the regulator.

Implementation Method 1

a first elastic membrane forming one of the walls of said chamber, a first spring acting on this first elastic membrane in the direction of said chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a second elastic membrane forming one of the walls of said chamber, a second spring acting on this second elastic membrane in the direction of said chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

an obturator axis movable between an open position and a complete closing position of said gas inlet, means for elastic return of this shutter pin to its completely closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic potential energy storage and release: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2816436B1Gas regulator with integrated excess pressure safety
Publication Date: 2018.08.22 CLESSE IND
  • EP2816436B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2816436B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP2816436B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

This gas regulator includes a body defining at least one chamber into which a gas inlet and outlet open, means for reducing the gas pressure in said chamber and means for blocking the flow of gas between said inlet and said outlet when the gas pressure in said chamber exceeds a predetermined threshold.