Gas Sampling Chamber Control for Automated Landfill Well Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gas extraction systems from landfills are inefficient due to frequent manual tuning of gas wells, leading to suboptimal energy production and potential gas leaks, as technicians must frequently visit hundreds of wells to measure and regulate gas composition, resulting in costly and time-consuming processes with delayed detection of leaks.

Innovation Solution

A gas monitoring and control system that includes a gas sampling chamber with sensors to measure gas characteristics, a controller to regulate valve operation based on sensor data, and a valve actuator to adjust gas flow, allowing for real-time monitoring and control of gas extraction, reducing manual intervention and enhancing leak detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual tuning of gas wells is performed frequently, then gas extraction effectiveness is improved, but labor cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas extraction effectivenessVSAvoidtime for technician visits
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated monitoring and control. Sensors continuously detect gas composition and well performance, the controller automatically analyzes data and adjusts valve positions, and the system autonomously optimizes gas extraction without requiring technician intervention. This resolves the contradiction by eliminating manual tuning while maintaining or improving extraction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual tuning process with an automated electronic control system. Physical technician visits and manual valve adjustments are substituted by electronic sensors, controllers, and automated valve actuators that continuously monitor and adjust gas well operation, thereby eliminating time loss while maintaining extraction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If manual inspection frequency is increased to detect gas leaks, then environmental safety is improved, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas leak detection capabilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous monitoring of gas composition and well performance through permanently installed sensors at each gas well. This continuous detection capability provides constant leak surveillance without requiring repeated manual inspections, thereby improving safety while eliminating the operational costs associated with frequent technician visits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated monitoring system performs self-detection of gas leaks and anomalies without human intervention. Sensors continuously measure gas composition, the controller analyzes data for leak indicators, and alerts are generated automatically, replacing costly manual inspection routines with a self-sufficient automated safety system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If gas wells are left untuned between visits, then operational cost is reduced, but gas extraction effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational costVSAvoidgas extraction effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated control system operates continuously without interruption, constantly monitoring gas composition and well performance parameters. This continuous operation ensures gas extraction effectiveness is maintained at optimal levels at all times, eliminating the productivity deterioration that occurs during intervals between manual tuning visits while incurring no additional operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces periodic manual tuning with continuous automated control. Electronic sensors and controllers continuously optimize valve positions and gas flow parameters, maintaining extraction effectiveness without the need for costly intermediate interventions. This substitution eliminates both the cost of frequent manual tuning and the productivity loss between visits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If more technicians are deployed to monitor gas wells, then leak detection capability is improved, but labor cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection capabilityVSAvoidlabor resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-monitoring capabilities through automated sensors and control systems installed at each gas well. These systems independently detect leaks, monitor gas composition, and alert operators without requiring human presence or manual inspection, thereby maintaining high reliability while eliminating the need for additional labor resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes human technicians with automated electronic monitoring systems. Sensors, controllers, and communication systems replace the manual detection and reporting functions previously performed by technicians, providing equivalent or superior leak detection capability without consuming any labor resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enables efficient monitoring and tuning of gas wells, minimizing gas loss, optimizing renewable energy production, reducing environmental risks, and enhancing safety by allowing for quick detection and regulation of gas leaks without manual inspection.

Implementation Method 1

a pump in operable communication with the sampling inlet valve and the sampling outlet valve, the pump operable to i) cause the gas to flow through the gas sampling chamber while operating in the gas sampling state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

one or more sensors disposed within the interior chamber, the sensors being operable to sense one or more characteristics of a gas from a gas source and generate one or more sensor signals representative of the one or more characteristics of the gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas detection:

Implementation Method 3

The valves can be positioned in varying configurations to regulate an amount of landfill gas evacuating to the main gas line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectValve flow control: Valve

Implementation Method 4

the gas from multiple wells is then collected using a main gas line and transported to a flare where it will be burned off

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS11340146B2Gas sampling and management system
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 CHRINTEC
  • US11340146B2 patent drawing
  • US11340146B2 patent drawing
  • US11340146B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas monitoring and control system including a gas sampling chamber, sampling inlet and outlet valves, a pump and a controller. Sensors are disposed within the interior chamber that sense characteristics of a gas from a gas source and generate representative signals. The sampling inlet and outlet valves i) allow the gas into the gas sampling chamber while operating in a gas sampling state, and ii) allow ambient air into the gas sampling chamber while operating in a purge state. The pump i) causes the gas to flow through the gas sampling chamber while operating in the gas sampling state or ii) causes ambient air to flow through the gas sampling chamber while operating in the purge state. The controller causes the sampling inlet and outlet valves, and the pump to alternate operating in the gas sampling or purge state to selectively expose the sensors to the gas.